WTI Crude


Brent Crude


Natural Gas




Heating Oil


Rotate device for more commodity prices

Alt Text

Gazprom Feels The Pressure Of Low Gas Prices

Gazprom has updated its 2016…

Alt Text

American Quiet Natural Gas Boom

The market for natural gas…

Alt Text

A Geopolitical Storm Is Brewing Over Libyan Oil

General Haftar’s recent offensive on…

Why Big Oil Shouldn’t Worry About Electric Cars

Electric Car

It may be a little premature for the oil industry to panic over the influx of electric vehicles (EV). EVs would need to represent at least 50 percent of the global car market by 2035 if the Paris Agreement’s minimum target for reducing global warming rates by 1.5 degrees Celsius is to become a reality, according to a fresh report by the Climate Action Tracker. But Big Oil can sleep easy, nonetheless.

To put the EV target in perspective, let’s see some new EV registration figures for Q1 2015 by the top performers worldwide. The leader was Norway, with new EV registrations accounting for a third of the total. Second from the top globally was the Netherlands, where new EV buys were 5.7 percent of all new registrations, and the UK came third with EVs accounting for 1.2 percent of all new registration.

In the rest of the leading car markets, including the U.S., China, Germany, and Japan, new EV sales didn’t even make it to 1 percent of total new car sales. What’s more, these figures include not just purely electric vehicles, but also plug-in hybrids, which use fossil fuel.

According to an FT analysis from 2010, projections are for EVs to reach a market share of around 9 percent in Western Europe by 2020, almost 14 percent in the US, and less than 3 percent in China. These are projections for a ten-year period, it’s worth noting, made when the EV industry was in its childhood.

Since then, incentives for EV buyers have been ramped up, carmakers are striving to make their electric cars more affordable and their batteries more durable, and campaigners are campaigning for a “paradigm shift”, as CAT calls it, that would see more people realize the urgency of climate change action.

Hypothetically, this paradigm shift would mark the beginning of the end for the oil industry as we know it. Realistically, however, such paradigm shifts take time, and a lot of it, especially if we’re looking at the world as a whole, not just the developed part of it.

In February this year, Bloomberg New Energy Finance published a report forecasting that by 2040 electric vehicles will account for 35 percent of the global market, with long-range EVs selling for an average $22,000. This, according to the authors, would be made possible by the billions of dollars invested in better, more durable batteries, and more efficient EVs, which should see the annual growth rate in sales of such vehicles at 30 percent or more.

According to the Bloomberg analysts, if this happens, EVs will displace around 1 million barrels of crude in daily global consumption some time around 2026, and 2 million bpd in 2028. To compare, the current oil glut is somewhere between 1 and 2 million barrels a day. And the oil industry is still standing. Related: Lack Of Pipelines Continues To Dog Canada’s Oil Industry

In its report, CAT, which is a group of four research organizations tracking the climate change fight efforts of 32 countries that account for 80 percent of harmful emissions, says that the last internal combustion engine-powered car must be sold in 2035, if the Paris Agreement targets are to be achieved. This basically gives carmakers less than 20 years to either switch to all-EV production or go under. It sounds unreal, and it is unreal.

Global new car sales so far this year in some of the biggest markets have reached 33.268 million as of end-August. At average new car sales of around 3 million vehicles a month, the annual this year could reach some 45 million vehicles. At the moment, the share of EVs in this total is 1 percent globally.

Going from 1 percent to 50 percent in a little over 30 years looks like a pretty ambitious plan—a plan that is contingent on too many ifs, such as governments having enough money to incentivize buyers and build the vital charging infrastructure; carmakers making good on their promises to roll out affordable and reliable vehicles; battery-makers making good on their promises, in turn; and, when all is said and done, car buyers having enough money to switch to EVs, not just in Western Europe and the U.S.

It seems to be indeed too early for the oil industry to start worrying about electric cars and the demise of the internal combustion engine.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Jörg Dürre on September 17 2016 said:
    I am perfectly fine with your conclusions. Let the fossile masters read and believe their ex post BP etc. studies.
    China goes by +188% more EVs in comparison to last years July reaching 1,1% of new cars. China left the below 1% club and aims at 1,5% by end of the year.
    Dynamics like Chinas 22 MW new photovoltaics in six month, outpacing total installations of the last fifteen years of Germany would have been called ambitious and were outclassed. This has of course not the faintest to do with electric cars. Why would anyone want to use this zero marginal cost electricity in expensive cars as long as the oil comes cheap.
    So do not worry mineral oil, its all good. But pump!
  • cowboybob on September 18 2016 said:
    Puhleeeze leave the "global warming" insanity out of this discussion. It's not science...it's political theater. Electric cars will not "save" the planet. Now if you'd like to get rid of oil...which you and your followers clearly do, then develop nuclear power properly and electrify the entire mess. Until then, oil powers the energy engine of the world. Get over it.
  • deek on September 18 2016 said:
    so the world is going to sit around and let ourselves be destroyed...for a little bit of profit?
  • Dutchie on September 18 2016 said:
    "Why big oil shouldn't worry about Electric Cars"?
    I hope they should start worrying about saving the planet they are also part of, and come with solutions in stead of this lacklustre behaviour as nothing is going on and everything will be alright..
  • Michael on September 18 2016 said:
    False argument - the key to electric vehicles's eventual success, which I do foresee, has nothing to do with all these "oh, gasoline is so cheap" articles like these from oil industry shills like Irina Slav. Who cares about the fuel? Electric vehicles eliminate hundreds of moving / replaceable parts and fluids... they're simply a more advanced technology than the internal combustion engine, which keeps tweaking it's 130-year-old technology, but really has nowhere to go. If I never have to replace another belt again, I'll be happy, believe me. We replaced the incandescent bulb, and we'll replace the internal combustion engine. Get ready, oil industry - because your feedstock petroleum is just too valuable to be burning in cars, anyway. You should welcome a different future.
  • przemo_li on September 19 2016 said:
    Tesla pays below 200$ per kWh already.

    Stop it to ~100$ and EV is cheaper on top of better.

    The only unknown is when those prices will reach majority of market, and how long over 20 years complete fleet replacement will happen.
  • Matthew Biddick on September 19 2016 said:
    To move any object, work must be performed. Energy must be available. Solar/wind, under the present technology, will never supply enough energy to power the world's vehicle fleet to any great degree. The following was taken from Wikipedia. If you want to skip it, at least read the final sentence.

    The work done by a constant force of magnitude F on a point that moves a displacement (not distance) s in the direction of the force is the product


    For example, if a force of 10 newtons (F = 10 N) acts along a point that travels 2 metres (s = 2 m), then it does the work W = (10 N)(2 m) = 20 N m = 20 J. This is approximately the work done lifting a 1 kg weight from ground to over a person's head against the force of gravity. Notice that the work is doubled either by lifting twice the weight the same distance or by lifting the same weight twice the distance.

    Work is closely related to energy. The work-energy principle states that an increase in the kinetic energy of a rigid body is caused by an equal amount of positive work done on the body by the resultant force acting on that body. Conversely, a decrease in kinetic energy is caused by an equal amount of negative work done by the resultant force.

    From Newton's second law, it can be shown that work on a free (no fields), rigid (no internal degrees of freedom) body, is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the velocity and rotation of that body,
    W=Delta KE.

    The work of forces generated by a potential function is known as potential energy and the forces are said to be conservative. Therefore, work on an object that is merely displaced in a conservative force field, without change in velocity or rotation, is equal to minus the change of potential energy of the object,

    W=-Delta PE.

    These formulas demonstrate that work is the energy associated with the action of a force, so work subsequently possesses the physical dimensions, and units, of energy.

    The work/energy principles discussed here are identical to Electric work/energy principles.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News