15 minsA $74 Billion Investment Plan for the UK’s Energy System
2 hoursU.S. Aims to Restock Strategic Oil Reserves by Year-End
3 hoursBill Gates-Backed Firm to Start Building First U.S. Advanced Nuclear Reactor
4 hoursExxon CEO Insists on IRA Subsidies for Hydrogen Project
5 hoursUkraine Drone Attacks Knock Out 600,000 Bpd of Russian Refining Capacity
6 hoursArgentina’s Economic Shock Therapy Leads Enel to Delay Sale of Power Distributor
19 hoursEurope Gas Prices To Fall Throughout 2024 Amid High Storage Levels
21 hoursU.S. Gasoline Prices Rise for Third Consecutive Week
22 hoursCNOOC Makes Another Major Oil Discovery Offshore China
23 hoursNations Divided Over Fees on Shipping Industry Emissions
1 dayChina Poised to Import Record-High Crude Oil Volumes From Russia
1 dayGermany Signs LNG Supply Deal With ADNOC
1 dayVenture Global Buys Nine Vessels to Transport LNG
1 dayChina Launches $4 Billion Power Transmission and Storage Project
1 dayOil Prices Continue to Advance as Bullish Sentiment Takes Hold
1 dayIran Signs $13 Billion Worth of New Oil Contracts
1 dayPutin Claims Election Victory as Ukraine Pounds Refineries
4 daysBloomberg Survey: Brent To Exceed $80 By Year's End
4 daysPoland to Sink $16 Billion In Energy Grid to Handle Renewables
4 daysUkrainian Drone Attacks Knock Down 370,500 Bpd of Russia’s Refining Capacity
4 daysCourt Halts New Mining Permits in Argentina’s Key Lithium Region
4 daysUkrainian Drones Attack Another Russian Refinery
4 daysEU Warns of Heightened Somali Piracy Threat to Shipping
4 daysU.S. to Back Nevada Lithium Project With $2.26 Billion Loan
4 daysJapan Looks to Restart the World’s Largest Nuclear Power Plant
4 daysBahrain Oil Projects Gets U.S. Funding Despite Climate Agenda
4 daysBP Partners With Venezuela on Trinidad Gas Field
4 daysOil Prices Set for a Strong Weekly Gain on Demand Revisions
5 daysBrent Soars Past $85 As IEA Recalculates Supply, Demand
5 daysFourth Russian Lukoil Exec Found Dead by Apparent Suicide
5 daysAustralia’s Victoria State Fast-Tracks Renewable Energy Projects
5 daysBrazil Boosts Clean Energy Beyond Hydropower
5 daysVattenfall Ditches Project to Produce Hydrogen From Offshore Wind
5 daysU.S. Export Bank to Vote on Backing Bahrain Oil Project Despite Climate Pledge
5 daysIEA Sees OPEC+ Cuts Pushing Oil Markets Into a Supply Deficit
5 daysShell Eases 2030 Emissions Target
5 daysU.S. Wants Venture Global to Explain Confidentiality of Its LNG Project
5 daysEV Makers Worried About Europe’s Charging System
5 daysChina’s Construction Squeeze Prompts Refiners to Cut Production
5 daysMexican Oil Giant Pemex Eyes Net-Zero Status by 2050
3 minutese-car sales collapse
6 minutesAmerica Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
11 minutesPerovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
5 hoursGREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
3 hoursHow Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
14 hoursIf hydrogen is the answer, you're asking the wrong question
4 daysOil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
6 daysThe European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
1 dayBiden's $2 trillion Plan for Insfrastructure and Jobs
5 days"What’s In Store For Europe In 2023?" By the CIA (aka RFE/RL as a ruse to deceive readers)
A couple of weeks ago I opined in these very pages that WTI was essentially trading in a range created by sensitivity to its own price. The theory was that somewhere around the $51 level seemed to be pivotal, with production increasing above that point and decreasing below it. The natural tendency of markets to overshoot means that the range created extends several dollars either side of that point and the tendency of traders to place orders just inside a range means that it will narrow over time. That would give us a bottom somewhere around the $48-49 level. It is still really too early for a big old “I told you so”, but the price action in crude futures over the last couple of days definitely supports that theory.
(Click to enlarge)
After a rapid climb, increased U.S. production and talk of problems with some OPEC members’ resolve to stick the current schedule of cuts, let alone actually expand them, caused a rapid selloff. As usual that brought out the exaggerators. One particular “analyst” from a major Wall Street firm was all over the media predicting that WTI was going to $20 a barrel on the move down. One assumes that he was in need of attention, because he was totally ignoring the pricing dynamic around $51 and the trading reaction to it.
What has actually happened over the last couple of days is that futures got below $49 and then this week’s inventory numbers showed a much larger than expected draw on…
A couple of weeks ago I opined in these very pages that WTI was essentially trading in a range created by sensitivity to its own price. The theory was that somewhere around the $51 level seemed to be pivotal, with production increasing above that point and decreasing below it. The natural tendency of markets to overshoot means that the range created extends several dollars either side of that point and the tendency of traders to place orders just inside a range means that it will narrow over time. That would give us a bottom somewhere around the $48-49 level. It is still really too early for a big old “I told you so”, but the price action in crude futures over the last couple of days definitely supports that theory.
(Click to enlarge)
After a rapid climb, increased U.S. production and talk of problems with some OPEC members’ resolve to stick the current schedule of cuts, let alone actually expand them, caused a rapid selloff. As usual that brought out the exaggerators. One particular “analyst” from a major Wall Street firm was all over the media predicting that WTI was going to $20 a barrel on the move down. One assumes that he was in need of attention, because he was totally ignoring the pricing dynamic around $51 and the trading reaction to it.
What has actually happened over the last couple of days is that futures got below $49 and then this week’s inventory numbers showed a much larger than expected draw on crude stocks, and we reversed after forming a bottom around $48.20. If this afternoon’s rig count number is even marginally less than expected the pattern will be confirmed and WTI will receive another boost.
It is quite likely that even the longer term fundamental factors will be supportive of oil over the next few weeks, enabling a run back up to the top of the range in the low $50s. History tells us that the worries about OPEC’s resolve are entirely justified as in the past coming to an agreement and sticking to it have been two very different things. There is no reason to believe that this time will actually prove to be any different, but if nothing else the rhetoric looks likely to shift.
The OPEC members will meet in Vienna in a month’s time and, again as I have pointed out here in the past, there is a tendency towards unanimity of purpose as the meetings approach, even if there has been public sniping and disagreement in the interim. The thing to remember here is that nobody has anything to lose by talking oil up as the meeting approaches, so why would they not?
As I said earlier it is too early to be even planning, let alone performing, a victory dance, but the evidence so far suggests that WTI is still ranging. At any stage a major change in fundamental conditions could easily break us out of that range in either direction so risk control is still needed. If, for example, it becomes obvious that non-compliance is rampant within OPEC and the non-OPEC countries that agreed to the cuts a few months ago, then we could easily drop through $45. For now, though the range is intact and I am long WTI at $48.50, with a stop just below $48 and an initial target of around $51, and happy with the position.
To access this exclusive content...
Select your membership level below
COMMUNITY MEMBERSHIP
(FREE)
Full access to the largest energy community on the web