• 1 hour Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 7 hours Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 8 hours Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 10 hours Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 1 day Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 1 day Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 1 day China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 1 day UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 1 day Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 1 day VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 1 day Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 1 day Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 1 day OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 2 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 2 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 2 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 2 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 2 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 2 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 5 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 5 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 5 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 5 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 5 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 6 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 6 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 6 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 6 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 6 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 6 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 6 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 6 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 6 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 6 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 7 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 7 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 7 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 7 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 7 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
Alt Text

The New Challenger To Lithium Batteries

The lithium-ion battery is head…

Alt Text

India’s Urban Explosion Boosts Oil Demand

As India sees incredible growth…

Alt Text

Footloose Iraq Cannibalizes Saudi Market Share

OPEC’s de-facto leader Saudi Arabia…

Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

Shedding Some Light On U.S. Energy Consumption

Shedding Some Light On U.S. Energy Consumption

For an industry that has remained mostly unchanged throughout the twentieth century, lighting has seen a remarkable amount of turmoil and transition since 2000. Incandescent bulbs have been the standard technology in most lighting applications for many years, but two new technologies have started to take a substantial share of the market. While incandescent bulbs still held a significant share in 2011 for instance, the trend continued to move in favor of new technologies up until 2014.

Starting on January 1, 2014, U.S. law required new lighting efficiency standards which essentially banned the manufacture of many new incandescent light bulbs. That move, while pre-planned by Congress, was nonetheless remarkable because up to that point, more than half of all 40 and 60 watt bulbs were still incandescent ones. The 40 and 60 watt bulbs were mainstays for home lighting use and so essentially the law changed the way that many people had to light their homes. The phase out of many standard incandescent bulbs was gradual, starting with the uncommon 100 watt bulbs in 2012, and 75 watt bulbs in 2013.

While there are a number of new technologies that are competing for wallet share in the vacuum left by the departure of incandescent bulbs, the two most common types are CFL bulbs and LED light bulbs. Each type of bulb has advantages and disadvantages. Related: Decoding Saudi Arabia’s Strategy In Its Oil Price War

CFL bulbs, or compact fluorescent light bulbs, last about 8,000 hours versus 50,000 hours for LEDs and about 1,200 hours for traditional incandescent bulbs. CFLs use about a quarter of the power used by traditional incandescent bulbs but still about twice as much as LEDs. As a result, the cost for using CFLs is about twice the cost of running LEDs. And for most consumers, cost is what really matters with light bulbs, whether in office applications or home applications.

LED bulbs are much better for directional applications, like track lights, than for applications like lamps, but diffusers help somewhat when facing the latter issue. The downside of LED bulbs is primarily the upfront cost. LED bulbs generally cost at least twice as much as CFL light bulbs, although those costs pay off over time given the lower cost of use. Related: Why Venezuela’s Petro-Aggression In Guyana Is Being Largely Ignored

In short, CFL bulbs are cheaper upfront, but are not as energy efficient as LEDs, and over a period of several years, an LED bulb pays for itself in savings versus a CFL bulb. As of 2014, LED bulbs held only a very tiny market share – less than 5 percent – in standard A19 conventional bulb applications (2.4 percent share), linear work lighting (1.3 percent share), and bay lighting (2.2 percent share). Only in outdoor lighting applications, where LEDs have considerable value given the difficulty in changing bulbs, did the bulbs hold a 10 percent+ share (10.1 percent share).

That is an unfortunate reality because if all CFL and incandescent bulbs were changed to LED bulbs, it would translate into nearly 5,000 trillion Btu’s of energy saved, which represents almost 70 percent of the energy used in lighting applications. Nonetheless, for many applications, upfront cost is a more important factor than energy efficiency over time. Related: Oil Fundamentals Improve But Inventories Will Keep Prices Low

For instance, relatively few people live in the same house for a decade or more. As a result, buying premium bulbs which will literally last a lifetime is not economically rational for many individuals. The same logic applies to many businesses who may be leasing space for five years at a time rather than operating out of a building they own outright. The reality is that, in many cases, cost still matters a lot, and until LEDs come more in line with CFL pricing, their market share is likely to remain low.

Nevertheless, costs for LEDs continue to come down. Just a few years ago, a 60-watt LED lightbulb cost more than $100. Now they are less than $5 each. Costs will continue to decline, allowing LEDs to grab more market share. The future is indeed bright for LEDs.

By Michael McDonald of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • David Hrivnak on October 12 2015 said:
    LEDS are great and I swapped out all of our lights to LED and to our surprise we saved enough electric to power our plug-in Chevy Volt over 500 miles a month. Imaging powering your car from the energy saved in swapping lights.
  • Jim on October 12 2015 said:
    One factor missing from this analysis is actual field longevity of light bulbs. The US has much older housing stock than, let's say, Germany. I find the older wiring in some of the places I have lived in the US tends to burn out light bulbs much faster than their rating. It would be irrational to put a $5 LED in a socket in a pre-WWII house, if it might burn out in a storm a year after purchase. The $1 CFL is a no brainer. Will I pay an electrician $1,000 in order to save $20 a year in electricity with my LEDS? No way. The economics of LEDS simply are not going to pay for most consumers for years to come.
  • mulp on October 12 2015 said:
    If LEDs use half the energy but cost twice CFLs, then if you expect the CFLs to last only the five years you before you move, then the LEDs will not cost any more because you will pay enough less for electricity to pay the extra cost. If you hate the idea of giving the next tenant the cheap LED light, take the LEDs with you, putting the old lighting the apartment owner put in. Which in most cases is now CFLs as most large apartment managers took advantage of utility incentives to switch commercial lighting to CFL.

    And just to be clear, incandescent bulbs are NOT ILLEGAL TO MAKE, IMPORT, or SELL, its just that they must be 40% more efficient. Why 40%??? Simple, the US manufacturers of bulbs could only compete with Asian bulbs on halogen bulbs which were 40% more efficient. The EnergyStar standard made cheap Asian imports illegal while giving that market to US factories making halogen or similar incandescent A19 bulbs. Selling those US halogens with US profits makes the price as high as Asian CFL where profits are low for exactly the same factory because in Asia, putting people to work is more important than profits when money only earns 0-1% interest.
  • Neeraj on September 22 2016 said:
    LED Light is expensive but then LEDs will not cost any more ,you will pay enough less for electricity to pay the extra cost. LED Light is environment friendly, energy efficient and long lifespan. LED Light not contain mercury . So it is harmless.
    LED High Bay Light is perfect lighting for roads on highways more efficient compared to CFL lighting system.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News