• 2 hours Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 9 hours India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 14 hours Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 18 hours Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 24 hours Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 1 day Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 1 day Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 2 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 2 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 2 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 2 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 2 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 2 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 2 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 2 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 2 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 3 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 3 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 3 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 3 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 3 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 3 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 6 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 6 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 6 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 6 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 6 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 6 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 7 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 7 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 7 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 7 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 7 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 7 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 7 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 7 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 7 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 7 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 8 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 8 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
Alt Text

Footloose Iraq Cannibalizes Saudi Market Share

OPEC’s de-facto leader Saudi Arabia…

Alt Text

Aggressive OPEC Pushes Oil Prices Up

Oil prices are once again…

Alt Text

Kobe Steel Scandal Could Rattle Nuclear Industry

The scandal at Japan’s Kobe…

Putin Looking to Modernize Russia's Energy Sector, Bureaucrats Fight Back

Largely overlooked in the non-Russian press, an incipient struggle is developing between Russian Prime Minister Putin and his attempts to privatize some of the largest and most economically inefficient legacies of the USSR, the bloated behemoths of the Russian Federation’s energy infrastructure.

While foreign commentators increasingly decry that the Putin administration is centralizing authority and squeezing out capitalist initiatives to jumpstart the economy, the issue of privatization of the Russian Federation’s Soviet-era “crown jewels” should be attracting more foreign media attention, if for no other reasons than Russia competes with Saudi Arabia for the title of world’s leading oil producer and the nation’s natural gas reserves are the world’s largest.

But, in the clearest indication up to now that the Russian economy’s liberalization has bureaucrats increasingly opposed to reforms of the country’s energy sector, the Russian Federation’s Energy Ministry has not endorsed the Russian Federation’s Economic Development Ministry's proposals for the government completely to privatize state-owned oil companies Zarubezhneft and Rosneft, but the state’s largest hydropower producer RusHydro along with reducing the state’s stake in state oil pipeline monopoly Transneft as well.

In June 2011 Russia's outgoing president Dmitri Medvedev ordered a more aggressive privatization of state stakes in key companies as part of a policy to attract “smart (foreign) investments” to further a modernization agenda, but many state-owned energy companies, have been fighting a rearguard action against implementing the reforms.

Under the proposed Medvedev reforms the Russian Federation committed itself to divesting its remaining shares in the country’s leading energy companies, including RusHydro, Rosneft, pipeline monopoly Transneft and Zarubezhneft  within five years, also unveiling plans to reduce its shares in national power grid operator Federal Grid Co.

Sounds good on the surface, right? But the Russian Federation’s Energy Ministry subsequently discreetly lashed back, saying it opposed the planned privatization, questioning if the state budget would actually improve if the government went ahead with the asset sale under current economic conditions, which could have negative consequences for the national economy before concluding that Russia's foreign business partners were unprepared for such a policy shift of changing ownership at those companies.

The Economic Development Ministry's position is outlined in a letter that Russian Federation Energy Minister Sergei Shmatko sent to Economic Development Minister Elvira Nabiullina on 1 February discussing plans for the privatization of major fuel and energy companies wherein he wrote that the sale of the government's stake in Rosneft carries many risks for the company, and there should be no strict deadlines for divesting the state's biggest oil asset, citing the concerns after divestiture of consultants about the subsequent risk of higher borrowing costs for Rosneft, which would lose its sovereign-level credit rating if the government reduced its stake to less than a controlling interest.

So, why Putin’s sudden interest in opening up the crown jewels of the Russian Federation’s energy assets to (possibly foreign) investors?

Simple – state management of the companies has been fiscally inefficient and all need massive influxes of capital, whether indigenous or foreign.

To use American terminology, two decades after the collapse of the USSR, the companies have turned into “welfare queens,” requiring ever increasing amounts of state revenue to continue bumbling along in their non-accountable way.

But the entrenched interests are well dug in - the Russian Federation government still owns 100 percent of voting shares in Transneft, or 75 percent of charter capital. Transneft preferred shares, equivalent to 25 percent of charter capital, are held by private investors and Transneft represents one of the few Russian national interests that Putin’s presidential predecessor Boris Yeltsin didn’t put up for sale in the kleptocratic early 1990s.

Zarubezhneft, which specializes in oil and gas exploration and production outside of Russia, is currently 100 percent owned by the state. The Russian Federation’s Ministry of the Economy proposes to sell 25 percent minus one share in Zarubezhneftegaz later this year and the other 75 percent in 2016.

Rosnenft? Shmatko said that the sale of the government's stake in Rosneft carries many risks for the company, and there should be no strict deadlines for divesting the state's biggest oil asset.

Last but not least, the government proposes diminishing its stake in the country's largest hydropower producer, RusHydro, to 50 percent plus one share this year from the 58.6 percent it currently controls but RusHydro has indicated it would put the privatization plan on hold until at least 2015.

What’s going on?

Simple two decades after the collapse of the USSR, the Russian Federation’s energy company managers have signally failed to accommodate themselves to the global capitalist world in which they must now compete and Putin, having reviewed the books, has decided to apportion out a share of the companies to foreign capitalist to make the companies more efficient.

But the rearguard is fighting this in the form of Russian Federation Energy Ministry apparatchiks, who are not yet convinced that in order to modernize, the government must loosen its tight grip on the country’s natural resources.

Watch this space.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com

Back to homepage

Comments currently closed.

  • Fred Banks on February 16 2012 said:
    So the bureaucrats are going to fight back, are they. Vladimir Putin takes no prisoners, which makes him just the man Russia needs to make his country all it can be. Russia is a rich country: rich in minerals, talent and tradition. They have everything they need as long as they do not elect people like Mr B. and Mr O, and worse that those two multiplied by ten, Mr G.
  • Philip Andrews on February 16 2012 said:
    In addition to John Daly's report here there is further coverage of what are significant developments in Russia on Stratfor.com. Given that Putin is most likely to become Russian president again this year, and as such is likely to be launching a major development of Russia and the Eurasian block of countries, it is worth knowing as many good sources of info on this as possible.
  • Steven Craig on March 04 2012 said:
    I think Putin's banter about privatizing key Russian energy companies is about as sincere as Russia's presidential elections. It seems unlikely that someone with Putin's disposition would actively push to privatize strategic assets of the state - above all in the energy sector. Maybe this is just hot air from Putin's campaign trail
  • Philip Andrews on March 06 2012 said:
    'someone with Putin's disposition'?

    Ah you mean someone with a strong grip on his country's security so that it can't return to the catastrophic 90s. Someone who is leading the tendancy to integrate European and Russian economies to counterbalance the Americas and China.

    Someone who is trying to fight ingrained Russian corruption in otder to try to make his country's economy more efficient. Someone who is trying to balance his country's security with opening it up to foreign esp. German investment.

    Someone who has allowed the first reasonably transparent elections in Russian history with demonstrations etc.

    In other words someone who is doing well for his country and is trying the collosal task of reversing an impending demographic calamity (losing about 1 million Russians per year) without resorting to Stalinist methods.

    I think the man desrves credit for attempting all this in the present international climate. Are any Western politicians doing as much as he is?

    Well done Putin!

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News