WTI Crude

Loading...

Brent Crude

Loading...

Natural Gas

Loading...

Gasoline

Loading...

Heating Oil

Loading...

Rotate device for more commodity prices

Alt Text

Crude Rises In Spite Of Poor Economic Data

A flurry of weak economic…

Alt Text

Big Break Through For Small Scale LNG

While many LNG mega projects…

Alt Text

Oil Prices Rebound On Falling Gasoline Futures

Oil prices rebounded on Tuesday…

Leonard Brecken

Leonard Brecken

Leonard is a former portfolio manager and principal at Brecken Capital LLC, a hedge fund focused on domestic equities. You can reach Leonard on Twitter.

More Info

How Shale Is Becoming The .COM Bubble Of The 21st Century

How Shale Is Becoming The .COM Bubble Of The 21st Century

As I review the financials of one of the largest shale producers in the United States, Whiting Petroleum (WLL), I can’t help but notice the parallels to the .COM era of 1999 which, to some extent, has already returned to the technology and biotech sectors of today. Back then, the faster you burned cash to capture customers regardless of earnings to drive your topline, the higher your valuation. The theory was that after capturing the customers (in energy today, it is the wells) spending would slow and so would customer additions allowing companies to generate cash. By the way, a classic recent case is none other than Netflix (NFLX) which, in the past was exposed for accounting gimmicks that continue even today. It is still following this path of burning cash for the sake of customer additions, while never generating any cash in its entire existence.

Cash was plentiful in 1999 so it could always be raised as the Federal Reserve began its easy money era creating a series of bubbles for the next 15 years. Does this sound familiar to what is occurring now? It will end the same way and that process has already started as currency wars heat up and our economy grinds to a halt proving QE does not, in fact, create wealth (temporary yes for the 1%, short term, until POP) but instead it destroys it by distorting asset prices, misallocating investments, and ultimately creating an equity crash. Related: What Is Triggering Recent M&A Activity In The Energy Sector?

We just witnessed this in energy, as all the economic stats that distorted the real underlying economic weakness in the economy led energy producers to overproduce while easy money fueled it and expanded speculation in the futures market. Back in 1999 did the internet companies adapt their business models? Some which still survive today did, but most went bankrupt. The parallels here with energy are simply stunning as most E&P companies need to spend well over their operational cash flow in order to not only grow but to replace the wells that are producing tied to depletion. Money is free right? Well we are witnessing the first stages now and it may not last, as junk bond investors in energy can attest.

Further, US equity markets are beginning to “realize” that the US economy isn’t better off vs. Europe and the US dollar begins to fade as it shows signs of correcting as well. The Fed clearly isn’t as accommodative by instantly launching QE4, for a host of reasons, thus potentially opening the door to a deeper correction vs. prior ones in order to get what the 1% wants again: more QE. Yes the Keynesian feedback loop is real as, in the past, each equity correction was met with more QE. Related: Why The US Should Worry About Oil Sector Jobs

WLL, in its March quarter, generated over $200M in cash from operations and, with hedges and production expected to be flat sequentially for rest of year in 2015, expects to earn at least $850M in cash from operations, give or take. The problem is though, they need to spend $2B to keep it up because depletion rates are so high. They claim “growth” capital expenditures are discretionary (just like NFLX by the way, in capturing customers), but the realities are that wells in the Bakken deplete 80% in 12 months, so does that really sound discretionary?

What is worse is WLL continues to grow production even though prices have collapsed and cash generation is in decline. In fact, year over year cash generated from operations fell 30% despite production growing some 70% plus percent. Does this sound like a company you want to invest in or like one that is run efficiently? So, let’s review: .com companies did the same and the majority went bankrupt so if WLL and other E&P companies continue to spend cash well above their operation capacity, not because they want to but because they have to, it will lead to the same result as it did in 2000… POP! Related: We Are Witnessing A Fundamental Change In The Oil Sector

Most of these E&P companies who do not adapt will go bankrupt as the money runs dry, unless they spend within their operational CF. As of now, WLL specifically does not seem to be adapting as production rises this year and next. On their EPS call, management did say next year CF would fully cover capital expenditures which is encouraging, assuming current strip. Those companies that do adapt will not only survive but will thrive, as we believe that the ultimate result of all this will be much higher oil prices from here. The shale revolution will see a dramatic period of slow growth/no growth or more likely declining production as marginal players leave and costs to drill overall, outside of most prolific areas (as they run dry), rise. And as a reminder, OPEC does not have the spare capacity in hand to supply the market leading to the next boom in prices longer term. In the short term and as a rule of thumb, do not invest in those companies who spend considerably above the operation cash flow and only consider those that respect their limits.

By Leonard Brecken of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Roy on May 10 2015 said:
    "but the realities are that wells in the Bakken deplete 80% in 12 months" --

    you're completely wrong about that. no producer in the williston basin has experienced anything anywhere close to that. i have royalty ownership in hundreds of wells in the williston and follow all the operators closely that i'm affiliated with, clr, hess, statoil, aep and others.

    your whole essay is based on this one false premise.
  • Roy on May 11 2015 said:
    Look at it like this: I've spent $9mm on a completed well. If I produced 80% of the oil in 12 months in Core Bakken Dunn County (my most advanced area), 80% of 800,000 barrels(1), or 640,000 barrels in the first year ---

    even at $45 oil, according to your analysis, I've made $28.8 million back in a year! That's a hell of an IRR.

    In fact, I'd only need $14.50/barrel oil to break even.

    Under your scenario, all capital would flow into the oil business....nothing else would get done. At $60 oil we're talking 350% IRR (going on what you stated)!

    Are you trying to slide that by because you're a greenie or you shorted oil or what?

    I can hardly wait for your response which I'm sure you'll provide as a responsible contributor with no ulterior motives.

    (1) Continental Resources - Bakken Continues To Deliver Solid Economics, 2015 Drilling Program: Targeting 800 MBoe EUR per well.
  • thom on August 25 2015 said:
    I wouldn't make this case this way. To compare oil to the .com scene you miss, that .com wasn't supported by value but fiction. Oil firms have mostly real assets under their feet. They will go bankrupt if assets fall below, well you know the threshold. In this sense oil price is the way to watch. In this i commend to read your other piece regarding the price collapse.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News