WTI Crude

Loading...

Brent Crude

Loading...

Natural Gas

Loading...

Gasoline

Loading...

Heating Oil

Loading...

Rotate device for more commodity prices

Alt Text

Can Carbon Taxes Kill Pipeline Opposition?

Will Canada’s carbon taxes mitigate…

Holding 30% Of June Brent Crude Contracts, Is Glencore Manipulating Oil Prices?

Glencore Building

While oil bulls were delighted by Wednesday’s DOE news of an inventory drawdown refuting the prior day's API news of a major build, what was ignored was the build in Cushing storage (more on that shortly), which according to Genscape hit a utilization just shy of 80 percent, or more than 70 million barrels, a record high since Genscape began monitoring the hub in 2009. To be sure, the risk of running out of land storage has been one we have previously discussed on various occasions and hinted that one way this is being circumvented is with substantial amounts of oil being stored on tankers at sea, mostly by commodity trading companies who take advantage of the oil contango to generate month to month profits as producers choose to keep their product away from the market until prices rise.

As it turns out, not only is this the case, but according to Reuters, one particular energy trader - a name well-known to Zero Hedge readers - Glencore, has built up a massive inventory stake in the Brent market where it now holds an unprecedented 30 percent position in Brent, which it is holding for offshore storage in its tankers in hopes of pushing the price of Brent, and thus the entire energy complex higher, by limiting supply. Related: Oil Prices Slip As Stronger Dollar Outweighs Bullish IEA Data

As Reuters details, citing trade sources, Glencore has built up one of the largest positions in part of the Brent crude market which acts as a benchmark for global oil prices since the start of the year.

For those unfamiliar, the Brent market is based on four North Sea crude oils - Brent, Forties, Oseberg and Ekofisk, or BFOE. And, according to Reuters Glencore is quietly cornering the Brent market, by holding more than a third of the 37 BFOE cargoes loading in June and is expected to acquire more.

The report details that Glencore has been acquiring June BFOE cargoes through the "chains" - a forward market in which cargoes soon to be assigned loading dates are traded, according to trade sources citing data from pricing agency Platts.

"It's definitely a bold statement of market view by Glencore," said a trading source with another company operating in the North Sea. "You'd have to be in their heads and in their books to know exactly what's going on."

To be sure, Glencore has been alleged to "warehouse" oil previously, most recently in January when Bloomberg reported that "Glencore is said to be storing oil on ships off the coast of Singapore and Malaysia as a market structure known as contango allows traders to benefit from holding on to supplies for sale later. The commodities trader has at least 4 very large crude carriers, each of which can hold about 2 million barrels, floating at sea off the nations’ coast in Southeast Asia."

However taking advantage of contango for contango purposes is one thing. Attempting to corner the entire market is something entirely different, and has direct implications on the price of oil, something Glencore can further benefit from if it were to be concurrently long Brent.

According to Reuters, just under half of June's supply of the four benchmark crude grades amounts to nearly 10 million barrels of oil - over 10 percent of daily world production. "Glencore has got big positions all over the place in BFOE," said another North Sea trading source. "They are consistently keeping cargoes in the chains."

The company has taken this position as supply underpinning the Brent contract is set to be smaller than in a typical month. In June, output of the BFOE crudes will fall to 740,000 barrels per day - the lowest in almost two years - mainly because of maintenance at Ekofisk oilfields. This, say analysts, helped Brent futures for June delivery strengthen against the July contract and eventually trade at a premium - a structure known as backwardation and unusual when supply is generally ample. Related: OPEC Is Dead, What’s Next?

It also means that Glencore was likely losing money on the actual month to month roll of its inventory, however it was more than offsetting losses if it was concurrently long Brent as removing 30 percent of the overall market supply has certainly pushed the price of Brent notably higher.

Reuters sources agreed with this assessment: "Glencore have obviously been very bullish," the first trade source said. "Part of the explanation would be that they recognized there would be next to no Ekofisk around and the North Sea market would tighten up. So, why not?"

Why not? Well, because to some this stockpiling reeks of manipulation of the price by keeping a major amount of monthly supply off the market. And since Brent and WTI tend to trade largely in tandem, the answer to "why not" is because millions of consumers would end up paying far more at the pump than if Glencore was not choking supply just to boost its own earnings.

One way to see the impact of this may be to look at the strip which both in Brent and WTI has flattened substantially as can be seen on the chart below, as prompt month manipulation by the likes of Glencore pushes spot higher even as hedgers and long-term investors continue to sell the long end on expectations of declining future prices.

(Click to enlarge)

(Click to enlarge)

With the expiry of the June Brent futures contract at the end of April, the spread between the first-month Brent contract moved to a discount to the second month, known as contango and a more typical structure when supply is ample.

Trading houses such as Glencore, along with rivals Vitol, Trafigura, Gunvor and Mercuria, buy and sell physical commodities, from natural gas, to copper or crude oil, moving millions of tonnes of raw materials around the world each year. But because there are a small number of participants in the Brent market and it is far easier to manipulate the price, and it is therefore both not uncommon, and in fact frequent, for them to take large positions, which sometimes lead to unusual patterns in related physical and paper markets, according to other traders.

Glencore is not the first one who has done this: in January, Shell accumulated a large number of Forties cargoes and was expected to ship many of them to South Korea. This coincided with the last time the first-month Brent contract traded in backwardation to the second.

As for the market impact on both Brent (and indirectly WTI) it is elementary finance that when supply is throttled, the equilibrium price will rise substantially, as has been the case in recent weeks. Related: Kuwait Plans To Ramp Up Oil Production By 44% Before 2020

Finally, one question remains: who benefits? Well, one look at the net spec Brent long position shows that someone has been very bullish the Brent price. In fact, as of the past few weeks, net specs longs have never been higher.

(Click to enlarge)

And now that we know which trader has been cornering the Brent physical market, we can also make an educated guess which (same) trader has also made huge profits by betting on the recent surge in the price of Brent. Which, since the (same) trader controls the actual supply of Brent, is about as close to a "no-brainer" trade as we have ever seen.

By Zerohedge

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Sally U on May 13 2016 said:
    So we need a economic downturn, demand for oil drops, and Glencore is f******* royally.
    They have to unload as fast as they can find a buyer.
  • me on May 13 2016 said:
    What is the intention of this document, it seems to me the author is himself trying to lower the price of oil. Lower it in a nutless manner also, if this company actualy did buy up vast amounts of oil, then spend millions on thier fleet of offshore ships sitting there till the end of time doing nothing but costing a fortune, then at least they made a real move. The author of this junk did nothing but try and make money from fear, are you running in this election by any chance.
  • Bob on May 13 2016 said:
    Who to believe? Just saw a news piece that noted that the fundamentals perception was that all the Glencore "forties" cargoes have been sold. Article also mentioned that VLCC 2016 loading analysis suggested many arb storage plays were either concluded or are hanging unintended.

    Given the shrinking contango and difficulty in cornering even a small part of the oil market, I would probably take the zerohedge report lightly. But since Glencore's job is to basically manipulate prices best it can, who knows?
  • John Scior on May 16 2016 said:
    If there is one producer/ trader who is practicing this for financial gain, certainly others are doing it as well. Just a suspicion , but financial institutions that have made loans to oil exploration and production companies might also be playing a hand at keeping these firms solvent to preserve their portfolio of loans. If too many oil companies go bankrupt all at once, they'll suck the financial world right down with them. Therefore , again pure speculation, they would be willing to back such plays and market manipulation even at a loss, if it preserves a bigger position.
  • Ron R on May 16 2016 said:
    Note that Glencore (or anybody else playing this game) can make money by betting long on oil while they hoard it. Later, they're likely to lose money on the physical trade -- but they stand to make FAR GREATER PROFIT knowing when their hoard of oil will be released into the market (which will drive prices down), so they can short oil at the appropriate moment. In other words, they'll make money (by betting on prices going up) as they artificially drive prices higher, and they'll make money (by betting on prices going down) as they artificially drive prices lower. Sounds like a pretty good deal for them, but a bad deal for everybody else.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News