• 40 mins Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 2 hours Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 20 hours Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 20 hours Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 21 hours China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 21 hours UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 22 hours Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 23 hours VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 24 hours Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 1 day Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 1 day OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 2 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 2 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 2 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 2 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 2 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 2 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 5 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 5 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 5 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 5 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 5 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 5 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 6 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 6 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 6 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 6 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 6 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 6 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 6 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 6 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 6 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 7 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 7 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 7 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 7 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 7 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 7 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 8 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
Alt Text

Footloose Iraq Cannibalizes Saudi Market Share

OPEC’s de-facto leader Saudi Arabia…

Alt Text

What’s Stopping An Oil Price Rally?

Oil prices rallied in Q3…

Alt Text

Oil Prices Spike On Middle East Tensions

Oil prices jumped upwards on…

Gloria Gonzalez

Gloria Gonzalez

Gloria is a writer for Environmental Finance.Environmental Finance is the leading global publication covering the ever-increasing impact of environmental issues on the lending, insurance, investment…

More Info

China, Germany and UK Have the Most Stable Clean Energy Policies

China, Germany and the UK have the most stable and consistent clean energy policies, a boon for investors seeking jurisdictions with the least amount of uncertainty, according to a report by Deutsche Bank Climate Change Advisors.

The three countries rank best-in-class in terms of the transparency, longevity and certainty of their climate policies, according to the consulting firm’s global climate change policy tracker. All three countries have favourable and consistent policies to control emissions, such as binding or accountable emissions targets, renewable electricity standards and long-term energy efficiency plans. They also have strong financial support mechanisms such as feed-in tariffs and green banks to facilitate funding for clean energy projects.

The only concern in these ‘tier one’ countries is the UK’s budget deficit, but the government has plans to address it while preserving much of its green energy agenda, said Mark Fulton, global head of climate change research at DB Climate Change Advisors in New York. “We haven’t held that against them,” he said.

“The UK could have wobbled and didn’t,” he added. “The Germans, of course, don’t falter and China doesn’t either.”

Denmark, Finland, France and Italy fell into the ‘tier two’ category because they do not have green banks although they have feed-in tariffs (FiTs), tax incentives and other long-term funding programmes. Japan also fell into the second category because of the absence of a green bank while Brazil was placed in the group because of the lack of feed-in tariffs.

“I think it’s one of the things that can be very useful,” Fulton said of the green banks.

The DB report places a strong emphasis on the importance of FiTs, which exist in 20 of 27 EU countries, because they are highly effective, he added.

“FiTs usually see very strong responses,” Fulton said. “They’re criticised for their efficiency because sometimes they are couched too high and seem to be very expensive.”

But changes to a FiT can dramatically hurt a country’s profile, he warned. Ontario’s FiT programme has been viewed as a success because it has drawn C$20 billion (US$21 billion) in investments to the Canadian province. But evidence of challenges in connecting renewables to the grid have emerged, a clause in the FiT contracts allows them to be revoked and the country’s Conservative Party has vowed to repeal the tariff and other green energy policies if they take power in October’s provincial elections. 

“Ontario is signalling a losing position,” Fulton said.

Spain was placed in a lower tier compared to several EU counterparts because it retroactively cut the FiT for some solar arrays. “The retroactive changing of the FiT just crashed them,” he said.

US lingers at bottom of rankings, California second tier

Although the US ranks in the lowest tier because of a lack of federal policies, California made the tier two list because it met all qualifications except having a green bank, although supporters plan to push for its adoption. If California had a green bank, it would be in the highest tier, Fulton said.

The report examined three US states – California, Texas and New Jersey – because the authors felt it would be unfair to only examine what is being done, or not being done, at the federal level when several states have solid clean energy policies, he added.

But the cumulative impact of current policies will only reduce global emissions by nearly 11 billion tonnes (GT) to 49 GT in 2020, which is still about 5 GT higher than the target for stabilisation of the atmosphere at 450 parts per million of carbon dioxide equivalent, according to the report.

“The message is thus clear: policy at the current level still will not achieve the reductions necessary to stabilise global emissions at 2°C,” the report states.

By. Gloria Gonzalez

Source: Environmental-Finance




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on August 04 2011 said:
    Now that you have told me your dreams, Gloria, maybe some day I'll tell you mine. But first you have to convince me that you can add and subtract.
  • Anonymous on August 04 2011 said:
    If the carbon dioxide situation is that desperate, I see no point in abandoning nuclear energy. In 1954, the world's pioneering jet airliner - the British Comet - suffered two catastrophic in-flight breakups. The Comet was grounded and re-designed, and other jetliners like our Boeing 707 may have been modified to accomodate what we learned from the Comet failures. But we didn't give up on jet airliners for all time. Likewise, especially if carbon dioxide is as much of a problem as we are told, we shouldn't use Fukushima or Chernobyl as an excuse to abandon nuclear power for all time.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News