follow us like us subscribe contact us
Adbar

A Macondo Response to Oil Sands?

By Daniel J. Graeber | Thu, 26 July 2012 22:20 | 2

Provincial authorities in Alberta announced plans to review pipeline safety regulations following a series of oil spills in the region. Plains Midstream Canada, Pace Energy Oil and Gas, and Enbridge Energy all experienced releases, sparking ire from aboriginal groups and environmentalists already upset over plans to move oil to the western coast. In the U.S., protesters are likely to flock to Michigan's state capital this week to mark the two-year anniversary of the costliest onshore pipeline spill on record. With increasing focus on regional oil from tar sands, and the ongoing push to advance the Keystone XL pipeline, regional governments and industry officials will be hard pressed to allay growing concerns over pipeline safety.

Alberta's Energy Minister Ken Hughes said the number of spills involving pipelines in the province was down nearly 30 percent last year when compared with the 885 incidents reported in 2007. At least three separate companies reported recent spills in Alberta, however, leading to widespread criticism of pipeline safety in the province. "If" any action is needed to improve pipeline safety, he said, they'd be sure to happen. Alberta is among the largest sources of U.S. oil imports, meanwhile, and serves as the starting point for a pipeline network known in the United States as the Lakehead system. Two years ago, Line 6B of the Lakehead system ruptured and spilled about 20,000 barrels of crude oil into southern Michigan waters. The National Transportation Safety Board, in its report, said Enbridge knew of the issues that lead to the 2010 rupture five years ago, but did little to address the problem.

"Enbridge knew for years that this section of the pipeline was vulnerable yet they didn’t act on that information," said NTSB Chairwoman Deborah Hersman in a statement.

Enbridge recently announced a multibillion dollar effort to overhaul and expand its U.S. network of pipelines, including replacing sections of Line 6B. In Canada, meanwhile, the company is working to allay criticism of its $5.4 billion Northern Gateway pipeline that would deliver an estimated 525,000 barrels of oil per day from Alberta to the west coast for Asian exports. Pipeline company Kinder Morgan, for its part, aims to invest some $4 billion to build a parallel line for its Trans Mountain pipeline in an effort to tap into Asian markets. The 715-mile pipeline has experienced, on average, one leak a year for the past 10 years, but nothing that would compare to the Enbridge track record.

The flurry of incidents, coupled with major expansions tied to Alberta crude, help explain Hughes' reaction to growing concerns. Hersman, for her part, said the 2010 release in Michigan was a "wake-up call" not only to companies like Enbridge, but to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, which has "weak" regulations on the books.

Advocates of the Keystone Xl oil pipeline this week said the acquisition by the China National Offshore Oil Corp. of Canadian company Nexen Energy means the latest U.S. candidate for Alberta crude is needed now more than ever. The provincial government in British Columbia, meanwhile, said it wanted "significant improvements" to incident response before it backed the Northern Gateway. Pipeline companies like Enbridge and TransCanada, the company behind Keystone XL, are quick to note safety is a core part of their billion-dollar business strategies. But if the federal response to what seems to be systemic problems with transporting tar sands was even marginally close to the response taken with offshore spills, pipeline expansion, including Keystone XL, would grind to a halt.

By. Daniel Graeber of Oilprice.com

About the author

Contributor
Daniel J. Graeber
Company: Oilprice.com
Position: Senior Analyst

More recent articles by Daniel J. Graeber

Thu 17 April 2014
Putin is Losing Eastern European Energy Gamble
Wed 16 April 2014
Private Sector Driving U.S. Wind Market Forward
Tue 15 April 2014
Why Angola may be the next OPEC Darling
Mon 14 April 2014
U.S. Gas Prices Rise, but not because of Global Factors
Sun 13 April 2014
Eastern Europe has Nothing on Asian Energy Markets

Leave a comment

  • Martin Katchen on July 28 2012 said:
    It is beginning to look as if tar sands bitumen may be too corrosive for conventional pipeline materials. If that is the case, Alberta and Canada may need to look to building refineries and chemical plants to refine and process the bitumen in Alberta and export the refined products and petrochemicals (everything from fertilizer to nylon fabric to plastics resin) to the US and overseas through a combination of new refineries of the magnitude that we see in Texas and Louisiana, smaller pipelines along the Kindle, Northern Gateway and Keystone alignments and the CP and CN railways. It would mean many more jobs for Alberta than simply exporting the bitumen and make Alberta a magnet for growth and for job seekers from the US as well as Canada.
  • Mike Holmstrom on July 28 2012 said:
    Enbridge's Line 14 spill in Wisconsin on Friday, so, there's some issues still there. Add that to the West Shore Pipeline leak in Wisconsin, and you can see credibility sinking for the pipeline industry safety. Kinder Morgan also told Metro Vancouver politicians Thursday that bitumen floats in seawater, but there's still plenty of it along the bottom of the river in Marshall MI, 2 years after that massive spill.

Leave a comment