Latest Oil, Gas and INvestor news; Oil Price.com
Crude Oil Graph Heating Oil Graph Natural Graph Gold Graph
      Home Energy General A Bankrupt BP - Worse For The Financial ...

A Bankrupt BP - Worse For The Financial World Than Lehman Brothers?

PDF Print E-mail
Written by JSMineset   
Tuesday, 22 June 2010 18:29

The BP crisis in the Gulf of Mexico has rightfully been analysed (mostly) from the ecological perspective. People’s lives and livelihoods are in grave danger. But that focus has equally masked something very serious from a financial perspective, in my opinion, that could lead to an acceleration of the crisis brought about by the Lehman implosion.
 
People are seriously underestimating how much liquidity in the global financial world is dependent on a solvent BP. BP extends credit – through trading and finance. They extend the amounts, quality and duration of credit a bank could only dream of. The Gold community should think about the financial muscle behind a company with 100+ years of proven oil and gas reserves. Think about that in comparison with what a bank, with few tangible assets, (truly, not allegedly) possesses (no wonder they all started trading for a living!). Then think about what happens if BP goes under. This is no bank. With proven reserves and wells in the ground, equity in fields all over the planet, in terms of credit quality and credit provision – nothing can match an oil major. God only knows how many assets around the planet are dependent on credit and finance extended from BP. It is likely to dwarf any banking entity in multiples.
 
And at the heart of it all are those dreadful OTC derivatives again! Banks try and lean on major oil companies because they have exactly the kind of credit-worthiness that they themselves lack. In fact, major oil companies, conversely, spend large amounts of time both denying Banks credit and trying to get Bank risk off of their books in their trading operations. Oil companies have always mistrusted bank creditworthiness and have largely considered the banking industry a bad financial joke. Banks plead with oil companies to let them trade beyond one year in duration. Banks even used to do losing trades with oil companies simply to get them on their trading register… a foot in the door so that they could subsequently beg for an extension in credit size and duration.

FREE Breaking Investment & Geopolitical Intelligence - Previously only available to Governments, Intelligence Agencies & selected Hedge Funds. Click here for more information on our Free Weekly Intelligence Report

 
For the banks, all trading was based on what the early derivatives giant, Bankers Trust, named their trading system: RAROC – or, Risk Adjusted Return on Credit. Trading is a function of credit bequeathed, mixed with the risk of the (trading) position. As trading and credit are intertwined, we might do well to remember what might happen to global liquidity and markets if BP suffers what many believe to be its deserved fate of bankruptcy. The Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has already been and will be further undermined by BP’s distress. They are one of the only "hard asset" entities backing up this so-called exchange.
 
If BP does go bust (regardless of whether it is deserved), and even if it is just badly wounded and the US entity is allowed to fail, the long-term OTC derivatives in the oil, refined products and natural gas markets that get nullified could be catastrophic. These will kick-back into the banking system. BP is the primary player on the long-end of the energy curve. How exposed are Goldman sub J. Aron, Morgan Stanley and JPM? Probably hugely. Now credit has been cut to BP. Counter-parties will not accept their name beyond one year in duration. This is unheard of. A giant is on the ropes. If he falls, the very earth may shake as he hits the ground.
 
As we are beginning to see, the Western pension structure, financial trading and global credit are all inter-twined. BP is central to this, as a massive supplier of what many believe(d) to be AAA credit. So while we see banks roll over and die, and sovereign entities begin to falter… we now have a major oil company on the verge of going under. Another leg of the global economic "chair" is being viciously kicked out from under us. Ecological damage is not just an eco-event on its isolated own. It has been added to the list of man-made disasters jeopardizing the world economy. The price tag and resultant knock-on effects of a BP failure could easily be equal to that of a Lehman, if not more. It is surely, at the very least, Enron x10.
 
All the counter-party risk associated with the current BP situation means the term curve of the global oil trade has likely shut down. Here we have yet another credit-based event causing a lock-up in markets that will now impede trade and commerce. It looks like an exact replication of the 2008 credit market seizure could ensue all over again – and it could probably be a lot worse. The world is in a far more delicate state now.
 
Although never really discussed, the world is highly reliant on BPs provision of long-term credit to many core industries. Who makes good on all the outstanding paper that so many smaller oil, gas and electricity companies, airlines, shipping companies, local bus, railway and transportation networks that rely on BPs creditworthiness and performance for? It doesn’t take a genius to figure out how this could all unwind. If BP has to be bailed-out, like a bank, the system will have to print even more unimaginable amounts of money.
 
The market, intellectually lazy and slow to realization, as it often is, probably has not woken up to it yet – but the BP crisis could unleash damage similar to the banking crisis. A BP failure through bankruptcy could make Lehman look small in comparison, and shake the financial house of cards we live in even more severely. If the implicit danger of the possibilities imbedded in such an event doesn’t make an individual now turn towards gold at full speed, it is likely that nothing will.

By. CIGA Pedro of JSmineset.com

Pedro’s credentials in energy exceed by orders of magnitude those talking heads giving daily BP opinions. In fact, Pedro’s credentials might just be better than all of them added together.
 
Submitted via Editorial Department. This article can be found at JSMineset.com

Please also take a look at Jim's excellent book on gold. If you have any interest in investing in the yellow metal there is no better guide than this: A Pocketbook of Gold

 

Comments  

 
0 #1 Bruce C. 2010-06-23 16:04
ere is one countering factor that was not mentioned here and that is the fact that the same entities - US gov., lawyers, etc. that could take BP go down may purposely keep it alive so that it provides a steady income to the leeches. Personally, I don't think they'll be able to resist sucking so much out of them initially, but it is possible.

The law firm hired to disburse compensations to the injured parties around the Gulf is working hard to find legal ways to allow ALL affected parties to make claims (i.e., restaurant chains, etc.), not just those affected directly. There is literally not enough money in the world to pay for that, never mind little 'ol BP.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 Dang 2010-06-24 01:13
Just another take over the u.s. gov will take over. Adding to the asset list of the many. Bankrupt them an take them over. fannie an freddie that holds 95% of all mortgages. The 2 automakers chevy an dodge. I wonder how ford slipped by. I see bp next an haliburton will also fall. The gov needs asets before it files bankruptcy
Quote
 
 
+2 #3 honestann 2010-06-24 22:52
The fundamental answer to this article is a question, namely: So what?

The notion rules must be bent to avoid some unpleasant outcome is the core reason the world is SCREWED - and now run by authoritarian PREDATORS.

This article, like endless justifications for creating "moral hazard" ignore equally endless negative consequences of "jiggering the rules" every time something inconvenient happens.

Nobody should imagine that any oil well or other operating asset will vanish just because BP does. They will all continue, under the ownership of better companies with better management. If BP has insufficient resources to pay for ALL negative consequences of the damage they caused, then let other companies buy those assets as part of BP liquidation.

THEN, pass the ONE and only law necessary. Every entity/company must have the resources (else purchase insurance) to fully compensate for the ***worst case*** disasters on every action they take.
Quote
 
 
0 #4 Martin Nance 2010-07-02 16:08
I am a former Bankers Trust employee; RAROC stood for Risk Adjusted Return on Capital (not Credit).
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh


 

Follow us on Twitter

Watch Financial Video News

Latest Comments
  • I had heard that Petronas had a disagreement and was packing up to leave Ethiopia. Is this true or a...
    More...
    By abinet2

  • That was good despite of financial constraints still the defensive side are keep on doing upgrading....
    More...
    By Stephen SS

  • When I began to teach energy economics, which was a long time ago, I knew about thorium. And it was ...
    More...
    By Fred Banks

  • Time to start learning Mandarin..
    More...
    By Sharky

  • I think the author of this article presented the fact and the consequence of the future in new wealt...
    More...
    By Getachew

Advertise on Oil Price.com
Oil Price.com
No. 1 Oil Resource Site
More About Us Energy Metals Alternative Energy Site Info
About Us Oil Prices Gold Nuclear Power Terms and Conditions
Site News Crude Oil Silver Solar Energy Disclaimer
Sitemap Natural Gas Prices Commodities Hydroelectric Privacy Policy
Advertise with us Heating Oil Platinum Renewable Energy RSS Feeds
© 2010 OilPrice.com
The materials provided on this Web site are for informational and educational purposes only and are not intended to provide tax, legal, or investment advice. Nothing contained on the Web site shall be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or offer to buy or sell a security to any person in any jurisdiction.