• 5 hours Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 hours Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 7 hours China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 7 hours UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 8 hours Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 9 hours VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 10 hours Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 11 hours Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 12 hours OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 1 day U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 1 day Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 1 day Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 1 day EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 1 day Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 1 day Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 4 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 4 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 4 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 4 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 4 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 5 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 5 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 5 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 5 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 5 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 5 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 5 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 5 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 5 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 5 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 6 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 6 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 6 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 6 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 6 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 6 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 7 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
  • 7 days Turkmenistan To Spend $93-Billion On Oil And Gas Sector
  • 7 days Indian Hydrocarbon Projects Get $300 Billion Boost Over 10 Years
Alt Text

This Unexpected Move Could Derail Mexico’s Oil Boom

A possibly disastrous move from…

Alt Text

The “Amazon Effect” Is Coming To Oil Markets

The move toward using software…

Alt Text

Saudi Arabia Looks To Shelve Aramco IPO

Saudi sources have confirmed that…

Ronke Luke

Ronke Luke

Ronke Luke has experience advising senior executives (including at the ministerial level) on initiatives to develop and increase uptake of advanced energy and environmental technologies…

More Info

Why The East African Oil Bonanza Remains A Dream… For Now

Why The East African Oil Bonanza Remains A Dream… For Now

When Tullow Oil (Tullow) announced the basin opening finds in Uganda and Kenya in 2009 and 2012, oil prices were soaring and both countries were jubilant over joining Africa’s oil boom.

Undaunted by the collapse in oil prices, Uganda, Kenya and their exploration partners press forward with development of their massive oil fields estimated at 6.5 billion barrels in Uganda and 600 million barrels in Kenya.

Related: This British Bank Is Backing The Bullish Case For Oil

Getting the waxy crude to market was always going to be a challenge. Uganda is landlocked; its oil fields 1,350 KM from the coast. Kenya’s oil fields are 850KM from the planned export terminal. To complicate things further, the required heated pipeline, the longest in the world, will pass through environmentally-sensitive areas.

Two of the three proposed pipeline routes envisioned Uganda and Kenya jointly pursuing a project carrying crude from both nations to export terminals on Kenya’s coast. The third route by-passed Kenya, running south through Tanzania. In 2014, Toyota Tsusho won a contract for feasibility design of a joint pipeline to Lamu in Kenya.

All seemed settled when the Governments of Uganda and Kenya issued a joint communiqué on August 10, 2015 stating that “two Presidents agreed to develop the least cost route to transport the oil to the East African coast. In this regard, the two Heads of State agreed on the use of the Northern Route i.e. Hoima-Lokichar-Lamu for the development of the crude oil pipeline.” Related: Oil Sands Producers Can Live With Alberta’s New Carbon Taxes

(Click to enlarge)

But no sooner had the ink dried, in October, 2015, Total’s CEO, Patrick Pouyanne, citing security concerns, announced that his firm had signed an agreement with Uganda and Tanzania to explore the southern route through Tanzania. The August joint communiqué had indicated that the northern route was subject to, amongst other things, “Government of Kenya guaranteeing security on the Kenya side of the pipeline.” With al-Shabaab showing that it can launch attacks on Kenya from just across the border, clearly Total and Uganda aren’t so sure. Related: Shell Forced to Scale Back Ambitions

A lot rides on the northern route. It is part of a massive regional integration project – LAPPSSET – that includes the port and power plant at Lamu, the crude pipeline from Southern Sudan and a highway to Ethiopia. The IFC has pledged $600 million to the joint Uganda-Kenya pipeline as part of a $1.8 billion package of regional investments.

Final engineering studies and investment decisions are now on hold awaiting clarification of the pipeline route. Uganda and Total don’t appear to be worried about any delays their decision is causing. Kenya is putting a brave face on any frustration; publicly shrugging off Uganda’s apparent change of heart. Acting Transport Cabinet Secretary James Macharia is quoted as saying Kenya is “undeterred.” He claims everything is “...going according to our own plans. Nothing has changed."

However, Kenya and its exploration partners will clearly be the losers if Uganda defects to the southern route. The costs to go it alone on the Kenya-portion of the $4.5 billion project are not insignificant. Africa Oil recently reiterated that the joint northern route to Lamu is the only economically-viable option. Uganda and Total might have the final say.

By Ronke Luke of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • George Williamson on December 02 2015 said:
    Sooner or later Kenya is going to be forced to grasp the nettle and go it alone with Ethiopia and South Sudan.

    The clue is the dates and amounts: Uganda's oil was discovered in 2009 - six years ago, and what has transpired in the meantime from Uganda's autocratic governor? Sweet Tweet, except for the creation of Uganda's National Oilco - in 2015. Museveni is clearly in no hurry. We have no idea why.

    Secondly, Uganda has 10 times the amount so far found in Kenya. At 6.5 billion barrels you could pipe it over the Ruwenzori, across the Congo, offload on the West Coast somewhere, and still make a profit. The extra cost of a southern pipeline across Tanzania is easily affordable.

    Sometime, fairly soon, Kenya and it's partners will have to decide to build in the north and just invite Museveni to connect up at some later date. The idiosyncratic dictator is apparently not smart enough to realise that once Kenya goes it alone, his rights to join in and the costs of transportation are up for negotiation and he does't have a leg to stand on.

    Typical Africa. Everybody has to wait for the Big Man to decide what he wants, and heaven help the Wenachi in the meantime.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News