WTI Crude

Loading...

Brent Crude

Loading...

Natural Gas

Loading...

Gasoline

Loading...

Heating Oil

Loading...

Rotate device for more commodity prices

Alt Text

U.S. Crude Oil Output Drops In September

U.S. crude oil production dropped…

Alt Text

Oil Majors Set To Lose $490 Billion If OPEC Talks Fail

With the official OPEC meeting…

Alt Text

Texas Oil And Gas Output Continues To Fall

The Railroad Commission of Texas…

When Needs Must: EC Greenlights Canadian Oil Sands Imports

When Needs Must: EC Greenlights Canadian Oil Sands Imports

Canada’s oil sands have long had a problem: They not only emit greenhouse gases when they’re burned as fuel, but they also require resource-intensive scouring when they’re produced.

But are they dirty? Not according to the European Union, which Canada hopes will become a major customer of its abundant oil sands. On Oct. 7, the European Commission decided to scrap plans to designate them as dirtier than other forms of crude, opening the door for Canada to export oil to the energy-hungry bloc.

The original EU plan had been to penalize the fuel, which generates about 25 percent more carbon than ordinary crude. The EC decision removes the oil’s condition during production from the equation.

Related: Breakthrough In Oil Sands Waste Treatment

With that obstacle out of the way, thanks to intense lobbying by Ottawa, oil suppliers will be able to ship, and European refineries will be able to receive, huge amounts of Canadian oil.

Canada has only recently begun to ship oil to Europe, but the future looks bright for both seller and customer, in terms of revenues and reliable energy. In fact, that was a major argument in Canada’s lobbying effort: With Western relations with Russia worsening, the EU must look elsewhere for reliable sources of oil and gas.

Reuters quotes anonymous sources at the EU as saying the need for a trade deal with Canada had been a factor given the situation with Moscow.

Meanwhile, Canada’s been preparing to export its oil in huge volumes. First, it’s working on the Energy East Pipeline running from its western province of Alberta, rich in oil sands, to the country’s Atlantic oil ports.

It’s also been planning the Keystone XL pipeline stretching from its province of Alberta, rich in oil sands, through the United States and ending at Gulf of Mexico oil ports. The project has stalled, however, because of opposition and legal challenges from private citizens in the U.S.

Related: Is This $7.6 Billion Deal A Sign of Things Coming?

Harvesting oil sands is harder than simply drilling for crude. The dense sands must be dug out or blasted with steam before their oil content can be pumped to the surface. As a result, the process requires far more water and energy, and emits more greenhouse gases than conventional crude oil extraction.

Meanwhile, the EC’s decision isn’t absolutely final. It includes a proposal to assess the levels of pollution of any given fuel from its development to its end-use. If any fuel, including Canadian oil sands, is found to be incompatible with the EU’s climate goals, then the EC will propose unspecified remedial action.

As EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said in a statement, “The Commission is today giving this another push, to try and ensure that in the future, there will be a methodology and thus an incentive to choose less-polluting fuels over more polluting ones like, for example, oil sands.”

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Reality on October 09 2014 said:
    Praise God Reality is finally dawning in Europe!

    Putin = DIRTY

    Oil Sands = FREEDOM!

    BIG OIL and the US need to start standing for Freedom, and stop living in an dream world that doesn't exist. Putin, ISIS, EBOLA,... just a few of the real problems that are out there.
  • Facts would be nice on October 09 2014 said:
    Facts would be nice. Opening statements like: "Canada’s oil sands have long had a problem: They not only emit greenhouse gases when they’re burned as fuel, but they also require resource-intensive scouring when they’re produced.". Newsflash! Combustion of all fuels, whether from Canada, the Middle East, or Asia all create green house gases. In fact, combustion through an internal combustion engine is where the majority of all GHG's are generated regardless of source.

    Also, less than 20% of Canada's heavy oil can be mined (or as termed above "scouring"). The majority of it is going to have to be recovered in-situ (in the ground using wells), results in less environmental impact from a surface footprint standpoint and less water usage (70-90% of the water for insitu-recovery is recycled as dictated by law).

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News