• 13 hours U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 15 hours Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 17 hours Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 18 hours EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 20 hours Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 21 hours Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 3 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 4 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 4 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 4 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 4 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 4 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 4 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 5 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 5 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 5 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 5 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 5 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 5 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 5 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 5 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 5 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 6 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 6 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 6 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 6 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 6 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 6 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 6 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
  • 7 days Turkmenistan To Spend $93-Billion On Oil And Gas Sector
  • 7 days Indian Hydrocarbon Projects Get $300 Billion Boost Over 10 Years
  • 7 days Record U.S. Crude Exports Squeeze North Sea Oil
  • 7 days Iraq Aims To Reopen Kirkuk-Turkey Oil Pipeline Bypassing Kurdistan
  • 7 days Supply Crunch To Lead To Oil Price Spike By 2020s, Expert Says
  • 7 days Saudi Arabia Ups November Oil Exports To 7-Million Bpd
  • 7 days Niger Delta State Looks To Break Free From Oil
  • 7 days Brazilian Conglomerate To Expand Into Renewables
  • 8 days Kurdish Independence Could Spark Civil War
  • 8 days Chevron, Total Waiting In The Wings As Shell Mulls Majnoon Exit
  • 8 days The Capital Of Coal Is Looking For Other Options
Alt Text

Who Are The Biggest Buyers Of U.S. Oil?

Exports of U.S. petroleum and…

Alt Text

World’s Biggest Oil Trader Questions Its Own Fate

The world’s no.1 crude oil…

Alt Text

Canada’s Pipeline Industry Takes Another Hit

Canada’s struggling oil industry has…

Ron Patterson

Ron Patterson

Ron Patterson is a retired computer engineer. He worked in Saudi Arabia for five years, two years at the Ghazlan Power Plant near Ras Tanura…

More Info

Oil Shipments By Rail Declining

Oil Shipments By Rail Declining

Weekly oil shipments by rail can be found on the web at Weekly Carload Reports. And a summation of that data with charts can be found at Association of American Railroads Freight Rail Traffic Data.

(Click to enlarge)

Crude oil by rail basically started with the shale boom. Prior to that almost all oil was shipped by pipeline. Of course a lot of oil was trucked to the pipelines. The EIA says in the first seven months of 2014, 8 percent of all U.S crude and refined products was shipped by rail. It looks like that percentage was increased somewhat in the second half of 2014.

(Click to enlarge)

Oil by rail, for the entire USA, peaked in August, September and October of 2014 and has declined since. Related: Can This Next Shale Hotspot Live Up To The Hype?

(Click to enlarge)

I have converted the weekly carloads to daily then converted carloads to barrels. There are about 700 barrels per carload. That gives us the average barrels per day by rail.

(Click to enlarge)

I have converted the weekly “daily average” to monthly “daily average” and plotted it against the North Dakota production. The EIA says: Between 60% and 70% of the more than 1 million barrels per day of oil produced in the state has been transported to refineries by rail each month in the first half of 2014, according to the North Dakota Pipeline Authority. Related: Can This Next Shale Hotspot Live Up To The Hype?

(Click to enlarge)

As we can see from this chart the volume of oil shipped by rail changes from month to month. The chart is barrels per day per month. The peak, for North Dakota, is December 2014. Oil by rail for the USA peaked about three months earlier.

Also the percentage of oil shipped by rail drops as production drop. This is because the pipelines are usually at max capacity so as production drops rail traffic takes the blunt of the decline.

The following is Art Berman’s take on the matter.

I have resolved the crude oil movement by rail issue that arose yesterday by comparing American Association of Railroads (AAR) data with EIA data. Related: More Job Losses Coming to U.S. Shale

Here is the AAR data:

(Click to enlarge)

Here are the problems.
1) The AAR data is for Petroleum & Petroleum Products whereas EIA data is for crude oil.
2) The AAR data goes through June whereas EIA data only includes April.
3) AAR data is in carloads or international units (whatever international units is) whereas EIA data is in barrels.

All that notwithstanding, the AAR data appears to be essentially correct in that it shows that 2015 rail shipments have probably dipped below 2013 levels assuming that the EIA data for May and June follow the AAR trend. That appears to be price-related as far as I can tell.

The EIA data allows me to exclude the possibility that the decrease in shipments is because of Canadian bitumen. It is down also but does not account for the magnitude of decrease.

The EIA divides oil movement by rail into PADD. 70% of total oil moved is from the Bakken and Colorado & Canada each have about 13%, with most of the small remainder (4%) from California.

In April, 96 kbpd less oil was moved by rail than in December (131 kbpd in February). April Bakken production was 59 kbpd less than December (February was 50 kbpd less), so it seems more than reasonable that the difference is being taken by the new 84 kbpd pipeline.

I think that the problem is solved.

By Ron Patterson

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Keith on July 20 2015 said:
    I raised the issue before in comments regarding the disparity between American Association of Rail figures of crude transported by rail versus EIA estimates of Bakken and US oil production.

    As a point of interest, the comment attributed to Art Berman may have an error. He suggests that 13% of crude by rail is Canadian. However, the AAR provide completely separate figures for Canadian rail transport.

    Petroleum and petroleum products moved by rail are now (July week 1) down 20% from the average for Q4 2014. Compared to December 2014 Bakken production of 1.227 MM bopd, this implies a reduction of 247,000 bopd. Even if 84,000 can be accounted for by new pipeline infrastructure, this still implies that Bakken July week 1 production is down by 163,000 bopd. That is 13.3%.

    Given that the rig count reductions for the other main basins are similar to those in the Bakken (65%), Eagle Ford (63%), Permian (57%), and applying a reduction of 13%, and assuming total unconventional oil production of 4,5 MM bopd in December 2014, July unconventional production is down 598,000 bopd.

    The EIA issues three different reports on US production and the numbers they give are different in all three. In the only one in which they suggest consistent drops since April (their Drilling productivity reports), the EIA's total reduction in production (including their prediction for August) is 332,000 bopd. Meanwhile this simple calculation suggests a number nearly twice as large.
  • Keith on July 21 2015 said:
    Taking this a little further, if the reduction in percentage of crude transported by rail does reduce as production goes down, and applying the figures given in this report (52% by rail versus a peak of 70% in December 2014), then the reduction in production for the Bakken implied by the 20% drop in rail transport is 183486 bopd rather than 247000 as commented above. Agreeing that 84000 bopd more is transported by pipeline, the reduction is 99485 bopd.This is a reduction of just over 8%. Assuming total US frac production is 4 MM bopd (rather than 4,5 MM), the implication is an overall reduction of 324000 bopd. The EIA drilling report prediction is that a similarr reduction of 332000 bopd will be reached in August.

    That seems more reasonable than the other figures issued by the EIA claiming still-rising US production, in the teeth of a rig count reduction of 60%.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News