• 3 hours India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 8 hours Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 12 hours Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 18 hours Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 19 hours Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 20 hours Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 2 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 2 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 2 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 2 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 2 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 2 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 2 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 2 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 2 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 2 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 3 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 3 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 3 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 3 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 3 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 5 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 5 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 6 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 6 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 6 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 6 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 6 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 7 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 7 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 7 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 7 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 7 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 7 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 7 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 7 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 8 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 8 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 8 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
Alt Text

Canada’s Pipeline Industry Takes Another Hit

Canada’s struggling oil industry has…

Alt Text

Is The War On Coal Really Over?

Even if the EPA manages…

Alt Text

Kuwaiti Minister: OPEC Deal Extension May Be Unnecessary

Kuwaiti Oil Minister Al-Marzouk has…

George Barber

George Barber

George has lived and worked in Indonesia for the past twenty-two years having had a successful career in the Royal Navy and private sectors as…

More Info

Is This The End Of The Road For Indonesian Oil?

Indonesian oil

The following three titles caught my eye during the past two weeks:

“Oil, gas sector continues to look bleak”, “Indonesian oil, gas firms rely on foreign loans for exploration” and “Result of 2016 block tender not so encouraging”

The first title claims that the future of Indonesia’s oil and gas sector continues to look bleak, with the latest estimates showing oil lifting rates plunging by almost half from current levels by 2020, with no new discoveries amidst low oil prices.

This is not news, this has been known about for many years and has been reported in various forms for the past two years at least with the same outcome, nothing. The low oil price has nothing to do with no new discoveries not being made, the cost of exploration has decreased, seismic offshore prices have probably decreased up to 50%, in some cases, they are shooting 3D offshore seismic for the same price as 2D seismic was two years ago.

Exploitation has continued without the discovery of new resources to replenish what is being taken out of the ground, so why should we be surprised at the title?

Now let’s deal with the second title; “Indonesian oil, gas firms rely on foreign loans for exploration”. The government should not be relying on international loans and companies to explore and take all of the risk, which is exactly what the second title is saying.

Why would foreign loans be forthcoming for the exploration of resources that may or may not be present in any given area? The article goes on to say that Indonesian lenders have decided that oil exploration projects were not bankable and thus oil contractors currently preferred foreign loans to finance their activities.

Why is this? If Indonesian lenders will not take the risk, why should foreign lenders take the risk? It is obviously a lot easier to obtain loans to build apartments and shopping malls from Indonesian lenders (when will the property bubble burst?).

The article goes on to say, “No national banks are capable of providing US$100 million for oil drilling projects,” adding that foreign financial firms have a larger capacity to disburse loans than the national banks. Given the situation, the government should create more incentives to stimulate the oil and gas industry.

Responding to that, the Interim Energy and Mineral Resources Minister Luhut B. Pandjaitan promised to revise regulations in an effort to encourage contractors to increase oil lifting.

Yes, regulations need to change; although changing regulations are just a part of what needs to be done. Indonesia has clearly let it be known that International companies are not that welcome, but on the other hand, they are seeking finance loans to finance high-risk projects that they are not willing to do themselves. Which really leads to the title of my last opinion piece "Give them data, and they will come” this would then encourage foreign lenders and possibly Indonesian lenders to be willing to invest based on data that will possibly reduce the risk of drilling dry holes by as much as 70/80% compared to the world's success rate of approximately 10/20%. Related: Bakken Halts Production Crash

Exploration costs are high, where the return on invested capital is always a risk for the investor; exploration costs need to be de-risked to the greatest extent possible. Investment in all exploration has reached alarming lows; only by de-risking exploration can we entice investors.

The way to de-risk exploration costs and increase the chance of success is to change the way that we carry out the initial exploration work and for the Indonesian government, banks or private entrepreneurs to invest in their own country.

Now let’s deal with the third title “Result of 2016 block tender not so encouraging”. Mr. IGN Wiratmaja, the Director General of Oil and Gas stated: "The result of the tender is enough to make us worry because there are some working areas that received no interest (from investors)." According to him, oil and gas blocks in Indonesia actually have a great potential but have generally failed to gain sufficient interest from investors. I was told recently that there is very little if any interest in Indonesia for investment.

This should not be a great surprise to anyone.

Major companies working offshore in the deep waters of Maluku, Papua and Sulawesi and the Makassar Strait, Sulawesi lost $1.6 billion from 2009 to 2013.

Are these figures encouraging for International lenders? They are certainly not encouraging to Indonesian lenders. Related: Why Iraq’s Oil Production Has Reached It Limits

Exploration is exactly what it says it is, exploration, we are looking for something in the hope that we will find something; we can compare this to looking for MH370, a needle in a haystack. We just do not know where the resources are, we just think we know.

To explore for resources offshore, we use seismic vessels which takes time, costs a huge amount of money and does not always provide the results that we are hoping for, as is indicated above in the amount of money that has been lost by some very large companies.

Something has to change, new ways of exploration have to be considered and used, people who make decisions have to make decisions and not be afraid of doing something that is not normal to them.

In 1914 the first patent was registered for seismic exploration methods, which was issued in 1917. In 1921, the world’s first seismic survey was carried out where it was determined that it could detect subsurface structures capable of holding oil. In 1928 the world's first oil was successfully drilled into a structure located by reflection seismography. People invented, people made a decision, and the rest is history.

It is the time that seismic surveys are supported (not replaced) by innovative tools, tools that can reduce the cost of exploration by as much as 80%, reduce the risk by as much as 60-80% and reduce the time of exploration by months or even years.

Without data you are just another person with an opinion, only by adopting new technology will Indonesia’s woes be resolved.

By George Barber for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Comments currently closed.

  • Paul Lafleur on October 01 2016 said:
    I agree with the premise of this article that new methods need to be found in addition seismic to reduce exploration costs. Notwithstanding major advances in seismic and other exploration technologies the success ratio for oil and gas exploration or wildcat drilling worldwide has remained low. Modern geochemical methods, such as Petro-Find soil gas surveys(http://www.gasoilgeochem.com), are important tools in the search for hydrocarbon reservoirs because they are direct indicators of hydrocarbons. Because no reservoir seal is perfect, all hydrocarbon reservoirs leak light hydrocarbons as microseeps to the surface. These microseeps travel vertically to the surface where they can be sampled and analyzed by the gas chromatograph. Concentration patterns or surface anomalies of these microseeps can be reliably related to petroleum/gas accumulations at depth. While piston coring is used for offshore some 5 methods can be used for onshore.
  • G>V> Chandrasekharan on November 04 2016 said:
    Paul Lafleur's experience as the world famous Geochemical Technology Inventor must be utilized by Indonesia at the earliest. Increased production out of these wells alone would tilt the scale in Indonesia's favour. Chandy, Vancouver.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News