WTI Crude

Loading...

Brent Crude

Loading...

Natural Gas

Loading...

Gasoline

Loading...

Heating Oil

Loading...

Rotate device for more commodity prices

Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

Poland Resists Global Shift Away From Coal

Coal Silesia

Across the U.S., Western Europe, and even in parts of Asia, coal is in secular decline. There will be very few coal power plants built in many western countries in the coming years if environmentalists have their way, and the superior economics of natural gas are piling on even more pressure. Yet there is still at least one major European nation where coal is thriving; Poland.

Poland may not be as economically developed as Britain, Germany, or France, but the country still has roughly 40 million people putting it in the top ranks of largest European countries. And Poland loves coal. The country produces 90 percent of its electricity from coal, and the government there is doubling down looking to build still more.

“Building more efficient coal power plants will get us better results in cutting CO2 emissions than building renewable energy sources like wind or solar,” says Energy Minister Krzysztof Tchorzewski, a member of the Law and Justice party, came to power in October with union backing after it pledged to preserve mining jobs.

All of this coal power is a double-edged sword. Coal has helped preserve more than 100,000 mining jobs across Poland, and the country’s economy is holding up about average for the EU as a whole. Poland has hit some hiccups in the last year, but that’s about par for the course for all major nations within the EU. On the other hand, the use of coal is clearly having a detrimental effect on some aspects of Polish quality of life. For instance, the World Health Organization estimates that two-thirds of the EU’s most polluted cities are in Poland especially in the mining region of Upper Silesia. Related: Oil Heads Lower For Sixth Day In A Row

Poland’s Law & Justice party has been a big supporter of the coal industry including encouraging three of the major utilities to invest potentially 1.5 billion zloty in a stake in restructured mining company Polska Grupa Gornicza. PGG’s business is looking shaky despite the new capital infusion and it’s unclear if the company is viable in the long run. Part of the problem may be that the Polish coal mining industry is structurally too inefficient for the modern economy and to compete in the long run against clean energy alternatives such as like windmills.

Poland is probably the future of coal in more ways than one. The durability of the coal mining industry is at least partially based on entrenched industry interests helping to promote the industry through the power of government. In the absence of government intervention, coal-rich Poland would still be using some coal just as the U.S. is, but probably not to the degree it currently does.

The future of coal is going to be increasingly reliant on preservation of the status quo. Regardless of whether one thinks global warming is a particular problem or not, it is clear that coal is a less attractive power option than natural gas or renewables. Coal requires difficult and dirty mining operations that employ people but in backbreaking work. Renewables and natural gas employ fewer people, but in arguably more pleasant and higher value-add functions.

Despite all of this, unions in Poland are predictably behind coal though including the powerful Solidarity union. Given that, it is unlikely coal will be going anywhere soon in Poland.

By Michael McDonald of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Kurt on July 28 2016 said:
    Poland strip mines a lot of her coal and contrary to what Mr McDonald says many of those jobs are anything but backbreaking as it is mostly done by machines; hard work, yes, but hardly backbreaking.
  • EdBCN on July 29 2016 said:
    I think you might need to check your facts on renewables employing fewer people. I don't know the number of jobs per kWh, or per $ invested, but I have read that there are now three times as many people employed in the US in solar installation as in coal mining.
  • Raphael Semmes on July 29 2016 said:
    This writer does not get it. Renewables are not attractive at all to consumers because they are expensive and unreliable. Wind does not produce electricity when the wind is not blowing and solar does not when the sun is not shining. Renewables not only cost more even when they are working, but they also have to have expensive backup for when they are not. Coal is the most cost effective way to produce electricity. Cost matters. Germany has foolishly jumped headlong into renewables and caused electric bills for its consumers to triple as a result.

    A politician who is pro-renewables is by definition a politician who is anti-consumer
  • Raphael Semmes on July 29 2016 said:
    When it comes to ''dirty mining'', coal mining in Poland is much cleaner than the mining process for the rare earth metals in China that are necessary components of both wind turbines and solar panels. When this is considered, solar and wind are highly polluting:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-clean-green-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News