• 55 mins Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 7 hours Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 8 hours Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 9 hours Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 1 day Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 1 day Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 1 day China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 1 day UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 1 day Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 1 day VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 1 day Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 1 day Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 1 day OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 2 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 2 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 2 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 2 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 2 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 2 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 5 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 5 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 5 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 5 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 5 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 6 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 6 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 6 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 6 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 6 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 6 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 6 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 6 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 6 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 6 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 7 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 7 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 7 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 7 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 7 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
Alt Text

Can Deep Water Wind Farms Power The World?

A recent study suggests that…

Alt Text

The Two Nations Leading The Wind Power Race

UK and China have joined…

Alt Text

Tesla’s New Frontier: Batteries And Wind

Electric car builder Tesla and…

Environmental Finance

Environmental Finance

Environmental Finance is still the only independent global magazine offering comprehensive coverage of the financial impact of environmental issues on the business community.  Leading industry…

More Info

Now the U.S. Attack Chinese Wind Towers with Tariffs

The US Commerce Department has once again imposed anti-subsidy penalties on Chinese renewable energy imports, this time of utility-scale wind towers.

The department issued a preliminary ruling on Wednesday in favour of a petition filed by the Wind Tower Trade Coalition, a group of US manufacturers of steel wind towers, and imposed countervailing duties (CVD) ranging from 13.74% to 26% due to unfair subsidies received by Chinese producers and exporters. This follows the department’s decision to issue both CVD and AD penalties against imports of Chinese solar cells and related products.

“The purpose of this case and the trade remedy laws is just to create a level playing field, to offset the level of unfair subsidies,” said Daniel Pickard, a Washington, DC-based partner with law firm Wiley Rein, who is counsel to the coalition.

The products covered by the decision are utility-scale wind towers, the steel towers that support the nacelle – the enclosure for an engine – and the rotor blades for use in wind turbines that have electrical power generation capacities in excess of 100 kilowatts. But the nacelles and rotor blades themselves are excluded, regardless of whether they are attached to the wind tower. The decision also excludes any internal or external components unattached to the wind towers or sections of the towers.

In 2011, imports of utility-scale wind towers from China were valued at an estimated $222 million.

The Commerce Department will instruct US Customs and Border Protection to collect a cash deposit based on these preliminary rates. Due to a change in practice, the department now requires importers to post cash deposits rather than bonds to cover the estimated duties for any petitions filed on or after 2 November, 2011. This means if the companies at the 26% rate are shipping $100 million worth of products, they will need to pay a $26 million cash deposit before the shipments are allowed into the US, Pickard said.

In contrast, the Chinese solar manufacturers hit by tariffs imposed by the department do not have to pay the full penalties in cash because the petition against them was filed in October 2011. Solar panel manufacturer Suntech is planning to post a bond that will require only a 10% deposit while the tariffs are preliminary.

The Commerce Department is scheduled to make its final CVD determination this August. If the department affirms its decision and the US International Trade Commission (ITC) makes a final ruling that imports of utility-scale wind towers from China materially injure, or threaten material injury to, the domestic industry, the department will issue a CVD order. If either the department or the ITC’s final determination is negative, no CVD order will be issued. The ITC is scheduled to make its final injury determinations in September 2012.

In companion antidumping (AD) petitions, the coalition has alleged that imports of utility-scale wind towers from China and Vietnam are also being unfairly dumped in the US. The department is scheduled to make its decision on that petition on 26 July. If Commerce makes an affirmative determination, preliminary AD duties will also be collected, according to Wiley Rein.

“There’s been a surge recently of imports from China and Vietnam at unfair prices,” Pickard said.
The AD duties would be additional to the CVD penalties and are generally higher, he said. “It’s not always the case, but that’s a good rule of thumb,” Pickard added.

By. Gloria Gonzalez

Source: Environmental Finance




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • MineMan on June 05 2012 said:
    About time. Of course this did not happen during the previous administration, WHY.
    I recall the negotiations for auto trade between US and China on imports and export of vehicles to China and from China. US negotiated a 3% tarrif on Chinese imports to US of Chinese mnaufactured cars. The agreeent was also that the US car makers would pay
    Wait for it...............25% tarrif.
    This negotiator left the administration in the next 3 months, this being his only negotiation.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News