follow us like us subscribe contact us
Loading, please wait

New Efficient Materials Promise a Photovoltaic Revolution

By Futurity | Sun, 17 November 2013 00:00 | 6

A new model for solar cell construction may ultimately make them less expensive, easier to manufacture, and more efficient at harvesting energy from the sun.

For solar panels, wringing every drop of energy from as many photons as possible is imperative. This goal has sent researchers on a quest to boost the energy-absorption efficiency of photovoltaic devices, but existing techniques are running up against limits set by the laws of physics.

As reported in the journal Nature, existing solar cells all work in the same fundamental way: they absorb light, which excites electrons and causes them to flow in a certain direction. This flow of electrons is electric current.

perovskite crystal
An illustration of the perovskite crystal fabricated in the experiment. (Credit: Felice Macera)

But to establish a consistent direction of their movement, or polarity, solar cells need to be made of two materials. Once an excited electron crosses over the interface from the material that absorbs the light to the material that will conduct the current, it can’t cross back, giving it a direction.

Related article: Ceramic Converter Tackles Solar Cell Problem

“There’s a small category of materials, however, that when you shine light on them, the electron takes off in one particular direction without having to cross from one material to another,” says Andrew M. Rappe, professor of chemistry and of materials science and engineering at the University of Pennsylvania.

“We call this the ‘bulk’ photovoltaic effect, rather than the ‘interface’ effect that happens in existing solar cells. This phenomenon has been known since the 1970s, but we don’t make solar cells this way because they have only been demonstrated with ultraviolet light, and most of the energy from the sun is in the visible and infrared spectrum.”

PHOTON ‘COINS’

Finding a material that exhibits the bulk photovoltaic effect for visible light would greatly simplify solar cell construction. Moreover, it would be a way around an inefficiency intrinsic to interfacial solar cells, known as the Shockley-Queisser limit, where some of the energy from photons is lost as electrons wait to make the jump from one material to the other.

“Think of photons coming from the sun as coins raining down on you, with the different frequencies of light being like pennies, nickels, dimes, and so on. A quality of your light-absorbing material called its ‘bandgap’ determines the denominations you can catch,” Rappe says.

“The Shockley-Queisser limit says that whatever you catch is only as valuable as the lowest denomination your bandgap allows. If you pick a material with a bandgap that can catch dimes, you can catch dimes, quarters and silver dollars, but they’ll all only be worth the energy equivalent of 10 cents when you catch them.

“If you set your limit too high, you might get more value per photon but catch fewer photons overall and come out worse than if you picked a lower denomination,” he says.

“Setting your bandgap to catch only silver dollars is like only being able to catch UV light. Setting it to catch quarters is like moving down into the visible spectrum. Your yield is better even though you’re losing most of the energy from the UV you do get.”

As no known materials exhibited the bulk photovoltaic effect for visible light, the research team worked to devise how a new one might be fashioned and its properties measured.

NEW FAMILY OF MATERIALS

Starting more than five years ago, the team began theoretical work, plotting the properties of hypothetical new compounds that would have a mix of these traits. Each compound began with a “parent” material that would impart the final material with the polar aspect of the bulk photovoltaic effect.

To the parent, a material that would lower the compound’s bandgap would be added in different percentages. These two materials would be ground into fine powders, mixed together and then heated in an oven until they reacted together. The resulting crystal would ideally have the structure of the parent but with elements from the second material in key locations, enabling it to absorb visible light.

“The design challenge,” says Peter K. Davies, chair of the department of materials science and engineering, “was to identify materials that could retain their polar properties while simultaneously absorbing visible light. The theoretical calculations pointed to new families of materials where this often mutually exclusive combination of properties could in fact be stabilized.”

This structure is something known as a perovskite crystal. Most light absorbing materials have a symmetrical crystal structure, meaning their atoms are arranged in repeating patterns up, down, left, right, front, and back. This quality makes those materials non-polar; all directions “look” the same from the perspective of an electron, so there is no overall direction for them to flow.

Related article: IKEA Tries to Simplify Solar

A perovskite crystal has the same cubic lattice of metal atoms, but inside of each cube is an octahedron of oxygen atoms, and inside each octahedron is another kind of metal atom. The relationship between these two metallic elements can make them move off center, giving directionality to the structure and making it polar.

THE ‘GOOD’ CRYSTAL STRUCTURE

“All of the good polar, or ferroelectric, materials have this crystal structure,” Rappe says. “It seems very complicated, but it happens all of the time in nature when you have a material with two metals and oxygen. It’s not something we had to architect ourselves.”

After several failed attempts to physically produce the specific perovskite crystals they had theorized, the researchers succeeded with a combination of potassium niobate, the parent, polar material, and barium nickel niobate, which contributes to the final product’s bandgap.

The researchers used X-ray crystallography and Raman scattering spectroscopy to ensure they had produced the crystal structure and symmetry they intended. They also investigated its switchable polarity and bandgap, showing that they could indeed produce a bulk photovoltaic effect with visible light, opening the possibility of breaking the Shockley-Queisser limit.

Moreover, the ability to tune the final product’s bandgap via the percentage of barium nickel niobate adds another potential advantage over interfacial solar cells.

“The parent’s bandgap is in the UV range,” says Jonathan E. Spanier, professor of materials science and engineering at Drexel University. “But adding just 10 percent of the barium nickel niobate moves the bandgap into the visible range and close to the desired value for efficient solar energy conversion.

“So that’s a viable material to begin with, and the bandgap also proceeds to vary through the visible range as we add more, which is another very useful trait.”

STACKED SOLAR CELLS

Another way to get around the inefficiency imposed by the Shockley-Queisser limit in interfacial solar cells is to effectively stack several solar cells with different bandgaps on top of one another.

These multi-junction solar cells have a top layer with a high bandgap, which catches the most valuable photons and lets the less valuable ones pass through. Successive layers have lower and lower bandgaps, getting the most energy out of each photon, but adding to the overall complexity and cost of the solar cell.

“The family of materials we’ve made with the bulk photovoltaic effect goes through the entire solar spectrum,” Rappe says. “So we could grow one material but gently change the composition as we’re growing, resulting in a single material that performs like a multi-junction solar cell.”

“This family of materials,” Spanier says, “is all the more remarkable because it is comprised of inexpensive, non-toxic, and earth-abundant elements, unlike compound semiconductor materials currently used in efficient thin-film solar cell technology.”

The research was supported by the Energy Commercialization Institute of Ben Franklin Technology Partners, the Department of Energy’s Office of Basic Sciences, the Army Research Office, the American Society for Engineering Education, the Office of Naval Research and the National Science Foundation.

By. Even Lerner

Leave a comment

  • bmz on November 18 2013 said:
    We have been hearing about a "materials breakthrough" that would make solar energy cost effective for the last 40 years.
  • eddy khan on November 19 2013 said:
    Sounds like another cancer cure story. It just ain't gona happen.
  • SA Kiteman on November 24 2013 said:
    Solar cells could be free and the combination of the balance of system costs and the unreliability would still limit the usefulness to specific load sectors which are basically exceeded in the US now.
  • James Wimberley on December 05 2013 said:
    Perovskites are a hot thing in solar PV research. Google Michael Graetzel of Lausanne. Researchers are already getting 15% efficiency in lab cells. Snaith and Johnston at Oxford have succeeded in making a perovskite cell by vapour deposition, avoiding expensive nanaoengineering. Their cell is transparent, so can used in multijunction devices on top of silicon.

    bmz: Plain vanilla silicon is cost-effective now, thank you (or rather thanks to the German ratepayers who paid for the learning curve). No materials breakthrough is necessary, and there is still plenty of potential for cost reduction in silicon PV through normal learning and economies of scale. For example, silicon refining is shifting from the Siemnens vapour deposition process to cheaper fluidised-bed reactors. However, it would be extraordinary if none of the many lower-cost technologies being investigated did not make it to market.
  • A.N. Optimist on December 09 2013 said:
    According to one presentation I heard, most people think the light bulb was just invented and became an immediate success. In reality, the from first demo of electric light to Edison's bulb took 80 years, plus another 40 years to power grid economic viability. Viewed from any reasonable time perspective, photovoltaic advances are amazing. Stop complaining.
  • Also an optimist on March 01 2014 said:
    What companies are taking an interest in this research? The apparent dramatic improvement in efficiency, cheap raw materials and cheap manufacture make perovkskite something to watch.

    Government investment in this area is wonderful but really amounts to no more than a subsidy. For this to take off it has to have profitability beyond national security interests in diversified domestic energy production. And I believe it will...

    Controversy over the environmental impact of domestic natural gas production is not going to settle down and simmer in the background like it did for coal for over a hundred years. I was raised in coal country amidst the "bony" piles. Jobs aren't going to be as big a factor in keeping natural gas on top when people can't trust their drinking water or air. (I'm from fracking country too). For all of these reasons the push to get new ideas in solar to market is greater than it has been in decades.

    If this were another silicon permutation I'd yawn too. But anything other than silicon should make us sit up and take notice.

Leave a comment