U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (right) and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Vienna before talks on November 24, 2014.
Iran and six world powers have agreed to extend talks on Tehran's nuclear program until July 1, 2015, after failing to seal a deal before a midnight deadline on November 24.
Diplomats said that under the terms of limited agreements reached after six days of high-level talks in Vienna, a political accord is to be completed by March 1, with final details contained in annexes to be sealed by July 1.
It was the second time the negotiators have extended the deadline for a pact to end a 12-year-standoff by curbing Tehran's nuclear activities, which Western nations fear could lead to the development of atomic weapons, in exchange for relief from economic sanctions that have damaged Iran's economy.
After a flurry of last-minute meetings in the Austrian capital, British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond said Iran and the powers seeking to rein in its nuclear program had "made some significant progress" in the latest round of talks, which began on November 18.
But Hammond said it "was not possible to meet the deadline" due to wide gaps on divisive issues including levels of uranium enrichment and the number of centrifuges Iran would be allowed to operate. Related: Iran’s Murky Nuclear Past May Disrupt Its Future
He emphasized that while July 1 was the new deadline for a comprehensive deal, the expectation was that a broad "headline agreement" would be in place by March 1.
Hammond said that expert level talks will resume in December, at an as yet undetermined venue, and that Iran will receive about $700 million per month in frozen assets.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said the powers could not keep talking with Tehran forever without serious progress, but it was not the time to walk away.
Kerry said "real and substantial progress" was made in the talks over the past days, but that there were still "some significant points of disagreement."
"These talks are not going to get easier just because we extend them. They're tough. They've been tough. And they're going to stay tough," he told reporters.
Kerry said there would be no additional sanctions relief.
He also called on the U.S. Congress to support the extension of talks.
German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said only differences about "technical details" remained.
"All the people involved here feel that there really is a chance to find out a way to each other and we are going to take that chance," Steinmeier said about the decision to extend.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov sounded upbeat, saying "we now know for sure" that the talks can produce a deal and that the negotiating nations "are resolved to continue working vigorously and without any delays."
"There is an agreement to continue talks. Within three to four months we seriously expect to produce a document that will contain all the key principles, the realization of which will be a matter of technical consultations and deliberations," Lavrov said.
An Iranian official confirmed the extension, which was announced after a meeting between the foreign ministers of the nations negotiating in Vienna, and Iranian President Hassan Rohani was expected to address his nation at 1900 Prague time on November 24.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose country has not ruled out bombing Iran's nuclear facilities, told the BBC that "no deal is better than a bad deal."
Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the non-proliferation and disarmament program at the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, told RFE/RL that “the chances remain slim” of reaching a deal in the next seven months.
“Maybe the people of Iran will make it all the more clear that they're tired of being isolated and sanctioned,” he said. “Maybe people in the United States will feel it's time to strike a deal with Iran that would enable Iran to become more of a player for the positive in various developments affecting the region."
According to Suzanne Maloney, a former State Department policy adviser and Iran expert at the Washington-based Brookings Institution, "it's hard to understand what more time will really resolve, and it is possible that the difference may simply be irreconcilable."
After sealing an interim agreement a year ago, Iran and the six powers -- the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France, and Germany -- had initially set a July deadline for a comprehensive deal, but extended it to November as wrangling persisted.
Middle East Tension
An agreement ending the standoff could remove one major source of tension in the Middle East and decrease Iran's isolation after decades of hostility with the West since the 1979 Islamic Revolution in the nation of 76 million.
But traditional Iranian foes Israel and Saudi Arabia are wary of any deal that fails to curtail Tehran's nuclear ambitions, while hawkish U.S. lawmakers have threatened to push for new sanctions on Iran -- something Russia adamantly opposes -- if there is no concrete progress in the talks.
Beyond assurances that the Iranians are not just talking to buy time to continue uranium enrichment, U.S. President Barack Obama's administration will want to show skeptics that it makes sense to continue the negotiations if the deadline is missed.
In addition to disagreement over the size and scope of the uranium enrichment program Iran would be allowed to carry out under a final agreement, Tehran and Western powers have also disagreed over how fast the sanctions would be lifted. Related: Iran Negotiations, OPEC Meeting Loom For Oil Markets
Depending on the level of enrichment, uranium can be used as fuel for nuclear power plants or for nuclear weapons.
Obama said on November 23 he was confident that if negotiators reach a deal that ensures Iran cannot produce enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon, then "not only can I persuade Congress, but I can persuade the American people that it's the right thing to do."
Iran has been hit with UN sanctions for violating its commitments as well as additional punitive measures imposed by the United States and European Union, which have harmed its oil-dependent economy.
The extension came after U.S. officials said Secretary of State John Kerry proposed to Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif late on November 23 that the sides start talking about the possibility of talks after the rapidly approaching deadline.
Before the extension was announced, Iranian diplomats had said they could try to turn to Russia and China -- which have far better relations with Tehran than the Western countries do -- for economic and diplomatic support if the talks broke down.
Source - http://www.rferl.org/
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
- End Of Life Costs For Nuclear Power A Real Concern
- Three Possible Outcomes Of Iranian Nuclear Talks
- Is This Reformed Nation the Reason For Oil's Fall?