• 1 hour Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 3 hours Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 5 hours EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 7 hours Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 8 hours Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 3 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 3 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 3 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 3 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 3 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 4 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 4 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 4 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 4 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 4 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 4 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 4 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 4 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 4 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 4 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 4 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 5 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 5 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 5 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 5 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 5 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 5 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 6 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
  • 6 days Turkmenistan To Spend $93-Billion On Oil And Gas Sector
  • 6 days Indian Hydrocarbon Projects Get $300 Billion Boost Over 10 Years
  • 6 days Record U.S. Crude Exports Squeeze North Sea Oil
  • 6 days Iraq Aims To Reopen Kirkuk-Turkey Oil Pipeline Bypassing Kurdistan
  • 6 days Supply Crunch To Lead To Oil Price Spike By 2020s, Expert Says
  • 6 days Saudi Arabia Ups November Oil Exports To 7-Million Bpd
  • 6 days Niger Delta State Looks To Break Free From Oil
  • 7 days Brazilian Conglomerate To Expand Into Renewables
  • 7 days Kurdish Independence Could Spark Civil War
  • 7 days Chevron, Total Waiting In The Wings As Shell Mulls Majnoon Exit
  • 7 days The Capital Of Coal Is Looking For Other Options
  • 7 days China’s Sinopec Puts $1B Argentina Oil Assets Up For Sale
Alt Text

This OPEC Strategy Could Boost Uranium Prices Next Year

Kazakhstan, the world’s largest uranium…

Alt Text

Russia’s Nuclear Sector Is Surging

With a long-standing nuclear tradition,…

Alt Text

Rising Costs Slow The Growth Of Nuclear Power

High costs and public fears…

Charlotte Dudley

Charlotte Dudley

Charlotte is a writer for Environmental Finance.Environmental Finance is the leading global publication covering the ever-increasing impact of environmental issues on the lending, insurance, investment…

More Info

France Gives Thumbs Up to Nuclear Energy with $1.4 Billion Investment

France will invest €1 billion ($1.4billion) in its nuclear power programme, bucking the post-Fukushima trend away from nuclear energy.

Announcing the energy funding package – which also commits a further €1.35 billion to renewables – French president Nicholas Sarkozy declared there is “no alternative to nuclear energy today”.

The €1 billion will fund ‘fourth generation’ nuclear development and research into nuclear safety, the president said on Monday.

The decision to boost nuclear power in France, which gets most of its energy from nuclear sources, goes against that of others in the region. Germany recently announced the phased shutdown of all its nuclear power stations by 2022, while earlier this month, Italian voters rejected a government push to reintroduce nuclear power.

Meanwhile, last week, the UK government also maintained its commitment to nuclear, confirming a string of sites for possible new nuclear builds.

The UK’s national policy statements on energy, released last Thursday, said renewables, nuclear and fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage “will all have a part to play in delivering the UK’s decarbonisation objectives”, and confirmed eight sites around the UK as suitable for building new nuclear stations by 2025.

The sites are: Bradwell in Essex; Hartlepool in Hartlepool borough; Heysham in Lancashire; Hinkley Point in Somerset; Oldbury in South Gloucester.; Sellafield in Cumbria; Sizewell in Suffolk and Wylfa on the Isle of Anglesey. There are existing or disused nuclear plants at all these sites.

The statements, which are to be debated in Parliament, include a commitment for an additional 33GW of renewable energy capacity, while the government said more than £100 billion ($160 billion) will be required to replace around 25% of the UK’s generating capacity, due to close by 2020.

Environmental NGOs expressed disappointment with the UK’s decision to pursue further nuclear developments with Friends of the Earth calling it “an expensive gamble”.

UK energy statements balance demand and targets

However, Ben Caldecott, head of European policy at asset manager and adviser Climate Change Capital in London, said the government has struck a fair balance between meeting energy demands and achieving emissions targets.

“I prefer renewable energy to nuclear power, but the fact of the matter is that if you didn’t replace any existing nuclear power stations, decarbonising the electricity sector would be that much harder. And that’s the challenge that Germany will be facing,” he told Environmental Finance.

The statements came out the same day Sam Laidlaw, CEO of UK utility Centrica, told an energy summit London that the UK’s first new nuclear plant will be delayed.

“There will be a delay, we just don't know by how much," he said of the plant due to come online in 2018.

By. Charlotte Dudley

Source: Environmental Finance




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on June 30 2011 said:
    Amazing isn't it, how the high and mighty find it necessary to lie to the proles. Of course nuclear is necessary, otherwise living standards - on the average - will fall. Let's put that another way: the Chinese, who have a couple of dozen nukes under construction, and a hundred in the planning stage, will take it all.Some British hypocrite says that he prefers renewables to nuclear. So do I, but once the cost is counted, renewables come in second place. And while I am at it, let me repeat. The Germans or or French or Icelanders or anyone else can say that they will give up or not have nulcear, but one country will never give it up. That country is Japan.
  • Anonymous on June 30 2011 said:
    > The Germans or or French or > Icelanders or anyone else > can say that they will give > up or not have nulcear, but > one country will never give > it up. That country is Japan.And another country that will never give up nuclear power is China, which you've mentioned. Yet another, is Russia.
  • Anonymous on July 01 2011 said:
    Thanks Alex...if you are on my side. Of course, if you are not on my side in this matter, please let me know. I am rehersing the keynote lecture on nuclear that I hope to give at...at...well wherever it is, and I will not be taking prisoners in that exercise.
  • Anonymous on July 01 2011 said:
    I am a supporter of nuclear power. Always have been, always will be.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News