follow us like us subscribe contact us
Adbar

Brazil’s Belo Monte Dam, Bad Idea?

By John Daly | Wed, 08 May 2013 22:10 | 2

Of the four BRIC nations, so beloved of Wall St. as the world’s economic future, only one, the Russian Federation, is a major energy exporter.

India and China are scouring the globe for energy imports.

Brazil, which two years ago became a modest hydrocarbon exporter, still needs to feed the rising energy needs of its population.

To that end, in Pará state in the Amazonian basin, Brazilian workers are feverishly laboring at the $14.4 billion Belo Monte dam on the Xingu river to complete the world’s largest hydroelectric facility, which, will generate 11,233 megawatts. When completed, Belo Monte will become the world’s third-largest dam generating electricity, exceeded only by China’s Three Gorges (20 megawatts) and Itaipu (14 megawatts), on the Brazilian border with Paraguay.

Hooray, right?

Depends who you talk to.

Norte Energia, the winning consortium of state-controlled firms and pension funds, has surmounted all legal challenges up to now. But not surprisingly, locals, including the Amerindian activist group Xingu Vivo (“Living Xingu”), have garnered some global heavyweight support, including U.S. filmmaker James Cameron, who has compared the Belo Monte dam-builders to the ecological villains in his blockbuster movie “Avatar.”

But wait a minute.

Related article: Russian Concerns over Central Asia Threaten Kyrgyzstan Hydroelectric Plant

Brazil was one of the first countries in the world to get into renewable energy, in the form of ethanol in the wake of the 1973 Arab oil embargo, and is now the world’s leading producer. Now, 46 percent of Brazil’s energy comes from renewable energy sources, and hydroelectric power plants currently produce over 85 percent of the nation’s electrical energy. In line with the current geopolitical buzz phrase “national energy security,” Brazil’s government has decided to press forward not only with Belo Monte but other new hydroelectric dams to guarantee the country’s energy security.

Well, now time for some bad PR. On 3 May 200 Amazon Indians occupied one of the three Belo Monte building sites, demanding that the Brazilian government hold prior consultations with indigenous peoples before building dams that affect their lands and livelihoods.

The legal disputes began in 1976, but last year, Brazil’s Supreme Court came down strongly in favor of the Belo Monte project, effectively leaving the opposition out of options.

The protest includes 100 Munduruku Indians from the Tapajos river, the only major river in the Amazon basin with no dams, but where the Brazilian government intends to construct a dozen more to meet Brazil's rapidly rising electricity demands.

And herein lies the crux of the issue. “The (Tsapajos is) only major river in the Amazon basin with no dams.”

The question arises, “qui bono?”

Not the Xingu, Munduruku, Juruna, Kayapo, Xipaya, Kuruaya, Asurini, Parakana and Ara Indian tribes which will be discomfited and displaced by Belo Monte and the other proposed hydroelectric projects.

Not only Brazilians, who will see unique cultures overwhelmed by the electrical needs of their more advanced consumer brethren, but in the end, people worldwide who still view human culture as more diverse than those aspiring to an apartment with electric power and a car in the garage.

Related article: Iran Abandons Chinese Help, to Build World’s Highest Hydroelectric Plant Alone

Brazil’s hydroelectric output already dwarfs that of other countries, but for those interested in increasing the nation’s electrical power grid, two-thirds of its hydro potential is untapped.
The bad news is that most of it lies in currently pristine rivers in the Amazon basin and of Brazilia’s 48 planned dams, 30 are in the Amazonian rainforest.

What do the protestors want?

According to a letter sent to the Brazilian government, the protestors said that Belo Monte's development has been progressing without consent or input from indigenous groups. "We want dialogue, but you are not letting us speak. This is why we are occupying your dam building site. You need to stop everything and simply listen to us. What we want is simple. You need to uphold the law and promote enacting legislation on free, prior and informed consent for indigenous peoples. Until that happens, you need to stop all construction, studies and police operations in the Xingu, Tapajos and Teles Pires rivers. And then you need to consult us."

Given the potential impact of the project, hardly sounds like an extreme request.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com

About the author

Contributor
John Daly
Company: U.S.-Central Asia Biofuels Ltd
Position: CEO

More recent articles by John Daly

Wed 16 April 2014
300mpg Diesel-Electric Hybrid Unveiled by Volkswagen
Mon 14 April 2014
Ohio’s Department of Natural Resources Links Earthquakes to Fracking
Sun 13 April 2014
Nigeria Planning Country’s First Nuclear Power Plant
Wed 09 April 2014
Abe Government Moves Towards Upgrading Japan’s Nuclear Facilities
Mon 07 April 2014
DOJ Extracts $5.15 Billion Settlement from Anadarko

Leave a comment

  • SA Kiteman on May 15 2013 said:
    The energy source with BY FAR the smallest physical AND carbon foot-prints is the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Recycler. It is the leanest, cleanest, greenest proven reliable source bar none.
  • Tamsyn Ayre on February 25 2014 said:
    Would you say there are ANY benefits to the building of Belo Monte? Obviously the cleaner energy and increased water supply go without saying, but is there any way the people can benefit from this?

Leave a comment