follow us like us subscribe contact us
Adbar

Exxon’s $100m Algae Investment Falls Flat

By Jen Alic | Tue, 28 May 2013 22:08 | 3

Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) is cutting its losses on algae biofuels after investing over $100 million only to find that it couldn’t achieve commercial viability.

Earlier this week, Exxon announced that while it wasn’t throwing in the towel, it would be forced to restructure its algae research with partner California-based Synthetic Genomics Inc (SGI).

When the two launched their algae-derived biofuels program in 2009, Exxon planned to invest around $600 million with the goal of developing algae fuels within 10 years.

Related article: Investment Boost for Next Generation Biodiesel Project

But it’s been more complicated than expected, and after $100 million down the drain, it has become clear that much more research—and at least another decade and half—are needed.

Exxon spokesman Charles Englemann told Bloomberg that the partners had “gained significant understanding of the challenges that must be overcome to deliver scalable algae-based biofuels.”

What they were hoping to achieve on a commercially viable scale was the exploitation of algae as a source of oil that could be converted in existing refineries into transportation fuels. 

According to Synthetic Genomics’ Chief Technology Officer James Flatt, the research has demonstrated that simple modifications of natural algae are not sufficient for commercial scale production. Research will now be shifted to focus on developing new strains of algae that can reproduce quicker. Or simply put, they will need to change the metabolism of algae. 

Related article: Waste Wood: Norway Taps into a Huge Source of Biomass Fuel

For SGI, it means a new agreement that allows it to get rid of the market pressure and focus on real research, getting back to the basic science. Exxon and SGI announced a new co-funding agreement that will bring their relationship into the above-mentioned phase II.

What does it mean for algae? It’s still growing on everyone, but there’s no commercial quick fix.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com

About the author

Contributor
Jen Alic
Company: ISA Intel

More recent articles by Jen Alic

Sun 18 August 2013
Egypt, Take III: No End to the Carnage
Thu 15 August 2013
Iraqi Oil Exports Slump But Optimism Abounds
Thu 15 August 2013
E.ON Sees First-Half Profit Slump in Europe
Tue 13 August 2013
Will Moribund Uranium Prices Rebound?
Sun 11 August 2013
BG Group Gets US LNG Export Approval

Leave a comment

  • anonymous on May 29 2013 said:
    "the research has demonstrated that simple modifications of natural algae are not sufficient for commercial scale production"

    Incorrect!!! There is plenty of existing algae strains that already have 30-60% oil content that are not genetically modified.

    All algae ponds have daily contamination issues and very low production. The EPA will never allow genetically modified algae grow in open ponds. It must be grown in large enclosed growing systems that can do 10x the production.

    In order to be profitable at commercial algae production you must need a minimum of 110 acres of "enclosed growing systems", not open ponds. Ponds have been used for research. Not commercial algae production.

    It was a flawed plan from the start using open ponds. Maybe Exxxon did not realize that the DOE Biomass Program's Acquatic Species Program years ago was a complete failure. Open ponds will never be used for commercial algae production.
  • eddie willers on May 31 2013 said:
    LOL....anonymous knows more that EXXON.
  • anonymous on May 31 2013 said:
    With all do respect, you can purchase existing algae strains with 30-60% lipid content (off-the-shelf) from some labs.

Leave a comment